| Title | Environmental sustainability assessment of different end-of-life scenarios for the pulper rejects produced in the paper recycling process |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 27253 |
| Authors | Ferrara, C; Scarfato, P; Ferraioli, R; Apicella, A; Incarnato, L; De Feo, G |
| Title | Environmental sustainability assessment of different end-of-life scenarios for the pulper rejects produced in the paper recycling process |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Resource recovery from wastes through recycling processes promotes near-zero-waste residue business models and supports the circular economy's goals by facilitating the closure of loops in industrial systems and reducing energy and resource consumption as well as pollutant emissions. However, the approach is sustainable only when the waste can be valorized, and the environmental impact of the recycling is lower with respect to other end-oflife (EOL) scenarios. Due to the diversity and complexity of wastes streams, these aspects need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. This study focuses on a mechanical recycling process for pulper rejects, a mixed waste stream generated during recycled paper production, with two aims: (1) to define a feasible mechanical recycling process and (2) to evaluate its environmental performance through life cycle assessment (LCA) compared to the most common EOL treatments, such as incineration with energy recovery and landfilling. ReCiPe 2016 H method was used to estimate the environmental impacts of all scenarios, adopting both midpoint and endpoint approaches, on a functional unit (FU) defined as 1000 kg of pulper rejects. The LCA results indicate that the pulper rejects recycling is always preferable to landfilling across all impact categories considered. On the contrary, in comparison to incineration, the best environmental option depends on the specific impact category considered. In particular, recycling is the best EOL alternative in terms of impacts on global warming, with an impact 33 % lower, but it is not the most sustainable one in terms of fossil resource consumption, mainly due to the amount of energy required during all steps of the recycling process, while allowing the recovery of materials that would otherwise be lost. Currently, it is not possible to identify an overall 'winner' between incineration with energy recovery and recycling for the pulper rejects because the most environmentally sound alternative varies depending on the priority given to different environmental issues. Therefore, further improvements of the pulper rejects recycling pathway performances are required to make the process even more efficient and competitive. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
13006
|
Khan, MMH; Havukainen, J; Niini, A; Leminen, V; Horttanainen, M Consequential life-cycle assessment of treatment options for repulping reject from liquid packaging board waste treatment(2023) | |
| 10679
|
van Ewijk, S; Park, JY; Chertow, MR Quantifying the system-wide recovery potential of waste in the global paper life cycle(2018) | |
| 4772
|
Huysveld, S; Hubo, S; Ragaert, K; Dewulf, J Advancing circular economy benefit indicators and application on open-loop recycling of mixed and contaminated plastic waste fractions(2019) | |
| 18008
|
Van Fan, Y; Cucek, L; Krajnc, D; Klemes, JJ; Lee, CT Life cycle assessment of plastic packaging recycling embedded with responsibility distribution as driver for environmental mitigation(2023) | |
| 17125
|
Civancik-Uslu, D; Puig, R; Ferrer, L; Fullana-i-Palmer, P Influence of end-of-life allocation, credits and other methodological issues in LCA of compounds: An in-company circular economy case study on packaging(2019) | |
| 21582
|
Abushammala, H; Masood, MA; Ghulam, ST; Mao, J On the Conversion of Paper Waste and Rejects into High-Value Materials and Energy(2023)Sustainability, 15.0, 8 | |
| 10615
|
Briassoulis, D; Pikasi, A; Hiskakis, M Recirculation potential of post-consumer /industrial bio-based plastics through mechanical recycling - Techno-economic sustainability criteria and indicators(2021) | |
| 22229
|
Faraca, G; Martinez-Sanchez, V; Astrup, TF Environmental life cycle cost assessment: Recycling of hard plastic waste collected at Danish recycling centres(2019) | |
| 1566
|
Horodytska, O; Kiritsis, D; Fullana, A Upcycling of printed plastic films: LCA analysis and effects on the circular economy(2020) | |
| 15501
|
Flizikowski, J; Kruszelnicka, W; Macko, M The Development of Efficient Contaminated Polymer Materials Shredding in Recycling Processes(2021)Polymers, 13, 5 |