| Title | Environmental impacts of circularity strategies for social distancing plastic shields made of polymethyl methacrylate in the United States |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 27523 |
| Authors | Cano, NSDL; Hossain, MU; Bilec, MM |
| Title | Environmental impacts of circularity strategies for social distancing plastic shields made of polymethyl methacrylate in the United States |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | One application of plastics that grew during the COVID-19 pandemic is for social distancing plastic shields, or protective barriers, made from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) such as transparent face guards. Although available for other applications, end-of-life impacts for barriers are currently lacking in the literature, and there is a need to fill in this gap to guide decisions. This study evaluated the end-of-life environmental impacts of PMMA barriers in the United States by using life cycle assessment. We evaluated five strategies including landfilling, waste-to-energy, mechanical recycling, chemical recycling and reuse. Data were sourced from literature and various life cycle inventory databases. The Tool for Reduction and Assessment of Chemicals and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) was used as the life cycle impact assessment method. Landfilling exhibited the highest impact in all indicators and reuse demonstrated optimal results for global warming potential. A scenario analysis was conducted to explore a combination of strategies, revealing that the most promising approach involved a mix of 40% reuse, 20% mechanical recycling and 40% chemical recycling. Circular economy recommendations are proposed for managing these sources of plastic waste in the United States. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
29250
|
Schulte, A; Kampmann, B; Galafton, C Measuring the Circularity and Impact Reduction Potential of Post-Industrial and Post-Consumer Recycled Plastics(2023)Sustainability, 15.0, 16 | |
| 4364
|
Ghosh, T; Avery, G; Bhatt, A; Uekert, T; Walzberg, J; Carpenter, A Towards a circular economy for PET bottle resin using a system dynamics inspired material flow model(2023) | |
| 21827
|
Klemes, JJ; Fan, YV; Jiang, P Plastics: friends or foes? The circularity and plastic waste footprint(2021)Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Utilization And Environmental Effects, 43.0, 13 | |
| 23569
|
Heller, MC; Mazor, MH; Keoleian, GA Plastics in the US: toward a material flow characterization of production, markets and end of life(2020)Environmental Research Letters, 15, 9 | |
| 3604
|
Ghosh, T; Uekert, T; Walzberg, J; Carpenter, AC Comparing Parallel Plastic-to-X Pathways and Their Role in a Circular Economy for PET Bottles(2023) | |
| 4615
|
Venkatachalam, V; Pohler, M; Spierling, S; Nickel, L; Barner, L; Endres, HJ Design for Recycling Strategies Based on the Life Cycle Assessment and End of Life Options of Plastics in a Circular Economy(2022)Macromolecular Chemistry And Physics, 223, 13 | |
| 28975
|
Nordahl, SL; Scown, CD Recommendations for life-cycle assessment of recyclable plastics in a circular economy(2024)Chemical Science, 15.0, 25 | |
| 1433
|
Vlad, IM; Toma, E Overview on the Key Figures with Impact on the Circular Economy Through the Life Cycle of Plastics(2022)Materiale Plastice, 59, 2 | |
| 18466
|
Klotz, M; Haupt, M; Hellweg, S Potentials and limits of mechanical plastic recycling(2023)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 27.0, 4 | |
| 25707
|
Venkatachalam, V; Spierling, S; Endres, HJ Recyclable, but not recycled-an indicator to quantify the environmental impacts of plastic waste disposal(2024) |