| Title | Design strategies to increase the reuse of wood materials in buildings: Lessons from architectural practice |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 27964 |
| Authors | Piccardo, C; Hughes, M |
| Title | Design strategies to increase the reuse of wood materials in buildings: Lessons from architectural practice |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The use of wood-based products might contribute to the mitigation of climate change and resource depletion in the building sector. However, the increasing demand for wood-based products might generate a trade-off affecting biomass availability, forest ecosystem services, and the climate change mitigation potential of forests. Therefore, it is important to couple the use of wood-based products with the adoption of circular economy strategies. Upstream strategies can facilitate the future reuse of wood elements in new buildings, whilst downstream strategies aim at the reuse wood elements originating from demolished or disassembled buildings, in new buildings. The aim of this study was to identify patterns describing upstream and downstream strategies currently adopted in architectural practice. A sample of real-world case-study buildings was identified and the respective designers were interviewed. The interviews identified three patterns for upstream strategies, namely the reversibility of joints, independence of different building components and prefabrication, and two patterns for downstream strategies, namely the recovery of salvaged wood and adaptability of the building layout. Several challenges were also highlighted. The use of upstream and downstream strategies can increase the time (and costs) in the design and manufacturing phase. Downstream strategies can also be influenced by the quality of salvaged wood. Upstream strategies showed difficulties to comply with current building standards (e.g. acoustic standards). Finally, metrics and indicators are needed in order to measure the efficiency of wood recirculation in upstream and downstream strategies, as well as to support their implementation. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
5828
|
Niu, YS; Rasi, K; Hughes, M; Halme, M; Fink, G Prolonging life cycles of construction materials and combating climate change by cascading: The case of reusing timber in Finland(2021) | |
| 4498
|
Ghobadi, M; Sepasgozar, SME Circular economy strategies in modern timber construction as a potential response to climate change(2023) | |
| 26869
|
Kret-Grzeskowiak, A; Bruhn, S; Jensen, AAV; Birkved, M Quantifying the environmental impact of structural timber across multiple future lifecycles(2024)Discover Applied Sciences, 6, 4 | |
| 21709
|
Pronk, A; Brancart, S; Sanders, F Reusing Timber Formwork in Building Construction: Testing, Redesign, and Socio-Economic Reflection(2022)Urban Planning, 7.0, 2 | |
| 25648
|
Walsh, S; Shotton, E Integrating Design for Adaptability, Disassembly, and Reuse into Architectural Design Practice(2024)Sustainability, 16, 17 | |
| 20403
|
Bergsagel, D; Heisel, F Structural design using reclaimed wood - A case study and proposed design procedure(2023) | |
| 68075
|
Pasternack, R; Wishnie, M; Clarke, C; Wang, YY; Belair, E; Marshall, S; Gu, HM; Nepal, P; Dolezal, F; Lomax, G; Johnston, C; Felmer, G; Morales-Vera, R; Puettmann, M; van den Huevel, R What Is the Impact of Mass Timber Utilization on Climate and Forests?(2022)Sustainability, 14, 2 | |
| 3219
|
Ahn, N; Dodoo, A; Riggio, M; Muszynski, L; Schimleck, L; Puettmann, M Circular economy in mass timber construction: State-of-the-art, gaps and pressing research needs(2022) | |
| 27199
|
Li, JY; Andersen, LV; Hudert, MM The Potential Contribution of Modular Volumetric Timber Buildings to Circular Construction: A State-of-the-Art Review Based on Literature and 60 Case Studies(2023)Sustainability, 15.0, 23 | |
| 77841
|
Toppinen, A; Autio, M; Sauru, M; Berghall, S Sustainability-Driven New Business Models in Wood Construction Towards 2030(2018) |