| Title | Does material circularity rhyme with environmental efficiency? Case studies on used tires |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 28045 |
| Authors | Lonca, G; Muggéo, R; Imbeault-Tétreault, H; Bernard, S; Margni, M |
| Title | Does material circularity rhyme with environmental efficiency? Case studies on used tires |
| Year | 2018 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The need for circularity assessment tools to prevent undesirable effects (e.g. recycling processes requiring more energy) is gaining recognition. Preserving resources and relieving pollution reservoirs are both necessary conditions to achieve a sustainable circular economy (CE), and the corresponding assessment tools should be selected accordingly. We chose life cycle assessment (LCA) and the Material Circularity Indicator (MCI). In this paper, we tested the tools through two case studies from the tire industry. The Brazilian case proposes three scenarios to process used tires: baseline, retreading and regrooving. The European case suggests collecting secondary material from end-of-life (EoL) tires to produce recycled content (RC) at 4% and 10% rates. These rates were chosen to illustrate the change in tire performance in the use phase. We propose an approach to discuss MCI and LCA results that identifies four pathways toward or away from the CE goal: coupling, decoupling, trade-off on resources or trade-off on reservoirs. The case studies reveal that extending lifetime through retreading and introducing recycled material improves the MCI of a tire but do not necessarily improve impacts on human health and ecosystems. Also, discrepancies in the results between the MCI and the LCA's resource indicator highlight relevant issues for new CE experts seeking to design assessment tools. Even though LCA provides a broader scope than the MCI, it still reflects a relative contribution to environmental sustainability while the MCI focuses on micro-scale improvements in resource use efficiency. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
2893
|
Araujo-Morera, J; Verdejo, R; López-Manchado, MA; Santana, MH Sustainable mobility: The route of tires through the circular economy model(2021) | |
| 17009
|
Avilés-Palacios, C; Rodríguez-Olalla, A The Sustainability of Waste Management Models in Circular Economies(2021)Sustainability, 13, 13 | |
| 421
|
Haupt, M; Hellweg, S Measuring the environmental sustainability of a circular economy(2019) | |
| 3682
|
Dobrota, D; Dobrota, G; Dobrescu, T; Mohora, C The Redesigning of Tires and the Recycling Process to Maintain an Efficient Circular Economy(2019)Sustainability, 11, 19 | |
| 20662
|
Soo, VK; Doolan, M; Compston, P; Duflou, JR; Peeters, J; Umeda, Y The influence of end-of-life regulation on vehicle material circularity: A comparison of Europe, Japan, Australia and the US(2021) | |
| 2028
|
Walker, S; Coleman, N; Hodgson, P; Collins, N; Brimacombe, L Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy(2018)Sustainability, 10, 3 | |
| 28602
|
Moraga, G; Huysveld, S; De Meester, S; Dewulf, J Development of circularity indicators based on the in-use occupation of materials(2021) | |
| 27490
|
Corona, B; Hoefnagels, R; Gürsel, IV; Moretti, C; van Veen, M; Junginger, M Metrics for minimising environmental impacts while maximising circularity in biobased products: The case of lignin-based asphalt(2022) | |
| 3074
|
Harris, S; Martin, M; Diener, D Circularity for circularity's sake? Scoping review of assessment methods for environmental performance in the circular economy.(2021) | |
| 943
|
Brändström, J; Saidani, M Comparison between circularity metrics and LCA: A case study on circular economy strategies(2022) |