| Title | Facades-as-a-Service: Systemic managerial, financial, and governance innovation to enable a circular economy for buildings. Lessons learnt from a full-scale pilot project in the Netherlands |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 28667 |
| Authors | Azcárate-Aguerre, JF; den Heijer, AC; Arkesteijn, MH; d'Alençon, LMV; Klein, T |
| Title | Facades-as-a-Service: Systemic managerial, financial, and governance innovation to enable a circular economy for buildings. Lessons learnt from a full-scale pilot project in the Netherlands |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Introduction: The challenge of the energy transition in the built environment has, in recent years, been exacerbated by rising awareness of the material resource limitations we face on the path towards sustainable development. In this context the concepts of Circular Economy (CE) and Product-Service Systems (PSS) have emerged as potentially complementary industrial and business strategies to overcome the interdependent material resource and clean energy challenges.Research significance: Research in the field of circular and PSS-based construction frequently centres on the design and engineering of products, mainly through technical strategies such as design for disassembly and adaptability, and the use of the different "R's" (Reuse, Repair, Remanufacturing, etc.) to extend and/or reset the service lives of building materials and components. Such an approach often ignores the fact that these strategies require changes in the management, financing, and governance aspects of products and therefore buildings, throughout their entire service-lives. This paper will focus on the systemic administrative (i.e. management, financing, and governance) challenges of the circular and servitisation transitions in the building and construction sector, to enable products which are "Circular by Design", to effectively support regenerative processes.Research question: The paper asks how traditional building products' management, financing, and governance processes prevent or delay the implementation of CE and PSS models. It explores the demand side's perspective (commissioners, building owners and facility managers), taking a systemic view to the search for new practical, strategic, and scalable administrative models.Methodology: The research method applies the DAS model (De Jonge et al., 2009; Van der Zwart et al., 2009; den Heijer, 2011; den Heijer et al., 2016) to data gathered from focus group discussion and co-design sessions involving multidisciplinary teams of experts from both academy and industry, as well as literature. The research was conducted within the context of the TU Delft Facades-as-a-Service full-scale pilot project.Results: The research has shown that, while PSS models to enable material circularity can be partially implemented within the current managerial, financial, and governance framework, this implementation is not efficient, effective, or scalable. This is because standard modes of operation in these disciplines are misaligned with that goal. The practical barriers resulting from this misalignment increase the complexity, risk perception, and therefore cost of PSS alternatives, and thus prevent their organic adoption despite increasing market interest. Recommendations are made for policymakers, financiers, suppliers, and building owners to overcome these barriers. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
22201
|
Geldermans, RJ Design for change and circularity - accommodating circular material & product flows in construction(2016) | |
| 23018
|
Azcarate-Aguerre, JF; Klein, T; Konstantinou, T; Veerman, M Facades-as-a-Service: The Role of Technology in the Circular Servitisation of the Building Envelope(2022)Applied Sciences-Basel, 12.0, 3 | |
| 3793
|
Giorgi, S; Lavagna, M; Wang, K; Osmani, M; Liu, G; Campioli, A Drivers and barriers towards circular economy in the building sector: Stakeholder interviews and analysis of five European countries policies and practices(2022) | |
| 3831
|
Charef, R; Morel, JC; Rakhshan, K Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review(2021)Sustainability, 13, 23 | |
| 1753
|
Kaewunruen, S; Teuffel, P; Cavdar, AD; Valta, O; Tambovceva, T; Bajare, D Comparisons of stakeholders' influences, inter-relationships, and obstacles for circular economy implementation on existing building sectors(2024)Scientific Reports, 14, 1 | |
| 3296
|
Aljaber, A; Martinez-Vazquez, P; Baniotopoulos, C Barriers and Enablers to the Adoption of Circular Economy Concept in the Building Sector: A Systematic Literature Review(2023)Buildings, 13, 11 | |
| 876
|
Minunno, R; O'Grady, T; Morrison, GM; Gruner, RL; Colling, M Strategies for Applying the Circular Economy to Prefabricated Buildings(2018)Buildings, 8, 9 | |
| 2103
|
Mangialardo, A; Micelli, E Rethinking the Construction Industry Under the Circular Economy: Principles and Case Studies(2018) | |
| 1947
|
Finamore, M; Oltean-Dumbrava, C Circular economy in construction - findings from a literature review(2024)Heliyon, 10, 15 | |
| 3773
|
Eberhardt, LCM; Birgisdottir, H; Birkved, M Potential of Circular Economy in Sustainable Buildings(2019) |