| Title | Multi-advantageous sorghum as feedstock for biogas production: A comparison between single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion systems. |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 29684 |
| Authors | Pasteris, AM; Heiermann, M; Theuerl, S; Plogsties, V; Jost, C; Prochnow, A; Herrmann, C |
| Title | Multi-advantageous sorghum as feedstock for biogas production: A comparison between single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion systems. |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a keystone in the circular economy concept. The produced biogas can be demand-driven controlled and regionally adaptable, but sustainable feedstocks are required. Sorghum is a valuable alternative considering its bioenergy potential and wide adaptability to different environmental conditions. In this study, AD of sorghum silage was performed in a single-stage continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and in a two-stage leach-bed reactor (LBR) system. The two-stage LBR system revealed higher methane yields (434 L-N kg(VS)(-1)) compared to the single-stage CSTR (308 L-N kg(VS)(-1)). Methane content of biogas ranged from 53 to 59% in both systems. Only the CSTR exhibited acids accumulation, led by propionic acid concentration (2.0 g L-1). Buffer capacity of the two-stage LBR system was superior to the CSTR. Technical disruptions and constant ammonium content declination were shown in both systems, associated to inherent characteristics of fibrous sorghum. AD of sorghum biomass, however, can be effectively performed under controlled conditions, generating high methane yields in both types of systems. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
14725
|
Shah, SV; Lamba, BY; Tiwari, AK; Chen, WH Sustainable biogas production via anaerobic digestion with focus on CSTR technology: A review(2024) | |
| 16570
|
Ellacuriaga, M; García-Cascallana, J; Gómez, X Biogas Production from Organic Wastes: Integrating Concepts of Circular Economy(2021)Fuels, 2, 2 | |
| 13245
|
Seruga, P; Krzywonos, M; Seruga, A; Niedzwiecki, L; Pawlak-Kruczek, H; Urbanowska, A Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Separate Collected vs. Mechanical Segregated Organic Fractions of Municipal Solid Waste as Feedstock(2020)Energies, 13, 15 | |
| 9304
|
Dhull, P; Lohchab, RK; Kumar, S; Kumari, M; Shaloo; Bhankhar, AK Anaerobic Digestion: Advance Techniques for Enhanced Biomethane/Biogas Production as a Source of Renewable Energy(2024)Bioenergy Research, 17.0, 2 | |
| 13219
|
Tampio, EA; Blasco, L; Vainio, MM; Kahala, MM; Rasi, SE Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and methane from food waste and cow slurry: Comparison of biogas and VFA fermentation processes(2019)Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11, 1 | |
| 5808
|
Sganzerla, WG; Tena-Villares, M; Buller, LS; Mussatto, SI; Forster-Carneiro, T Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Food Industry by-Products and Bioenergy Recovery: A Perspective to Promote the Circular Economy Transition(2022)Waste And Biomass Valorization, 13, 5 | |
| 15490
|
Azevedo, A; Lapa, N; Moldao, M; Duarte, E Opportunities and challenges in the anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sewage sludge and fruit and vegetable wastes: A review(2023) | |
| 13260
|
Heffernan, JK; Lai, CY; Gonzalez-Garcia, RA; Nielsen, LK; Guo, JH; Marcellin, E Biogas upgrading using Clostridium autoethanogenum for value-added products(2023) | |
| 14673
|
Neri, A; Hummel, F; Benalia, S; Zimbalatti, G; Gabauer, W; Mihajlovic, I; Bernardi, B Use of Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors for Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy and Meat Industry By-Products for Biogas Production(2024)Sustainability, 16, 11 | |
| 5461
|
Qayyum, S; Tahir, A; Mian, AH; Zeb, S; Siddiqui, MF; Rehman, B Optimizing biogas production through anaerobic digestion: transforming food waste and agricultural residues into renewable energy within a circular economy paradigm(2024) |