| Title | The Impact of the Voluntary Environmental Agreements on Green Technology Innovation: Evidence From the Prefectural-Level Data in China |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 30682 |
| Authors | Ren, K; Kong, YS; Imran, M; Bangash, AK |
| Title | The Impact of the Voluntary Environmental Agreements on Green Technology Innovation: Evidence From the Prefectural-Level Data in China |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Porter Hypothesis believes that moderate environmental regulation can promote the growth of green technology innovation. Voluntary environmental agreements are a typical type of environmental regulation and theoretically promote green technology innovation. In 1964, Japan was the first country in the world to implement a voluntary environmental agreement, with good results. Subsequently, European Union countries began to implement the "fifth Environmental Action Plan" on 1 January 1993, which effectively combined voluntary environmental agreements with corporate self-regulation. The prior empirical work assists the idea that environmental regulation has diverse impacts on the environment. However, China's voluntary environmental agreements have a short implementation time and lack of experience and need to be further explored in terms of policy proposal and technology implementation. The existing literature is based on a sample of units at the provincial level or national level are studied, utilizing multiple regression analysis methods, this study in China prefecture-level administrative units as investigation object, and choose the government environmental protection education, the government agreement propaganda, enterprise ecological ethics, information disclosure, market efficiency, and information technology support six elements as the key independent variables. This paper empirically examines the promotion effect of the voluntary environmental agreement on green technology innovation, finds the shortcomings of China's voluntary environmental agreement regulation, and puts forward specific improvement strategies to promote the growth of green technology innovation more effectively. It is found that government environmental protection education, enterprise ecological ethics construction, market effectiveness, and information technology support have obvious promoting effects on green product innovation, green process innovation, and end management innovation. Government agreement publicity has no promotion function for green product innovation, green process innovation, and terminal governance innovation. The disclosure of protocol information has a promotion effect on green product innovation, but it lacks the promotion function on green process innovation, and end management innovation. The research believes that the deepening of the implementation of voluntary environmental agreements in China should give full play to the leading role of the government, implement progressive policies, deepen the internal coordination of environmental regulations, give play to the supervision role of the public and the media, learn from the experience of western countries, and promote green credit. The finding of the study opens up new insight for appropriate policymaking. |
| https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.833724/pdf |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
30534
|
Ma, WJ; Wang, MY Discussion on the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation from the Perspective of Innovation External Cooperation: Evidence from Chinese Private Enterprises(2023)Sustainability, 15, 23 | |
| 30167
|
Wang, XS; Elahi, E; Zhang, LG Mandatory Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China(2022)Sustainability, 14, 20 | |
| 30239
|
Liu, JJ; Zhao, M; Zhang, C; Ren, FR Analysis of the Influence of Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Innovation(2023)Sustainability, 15, 4 | |
| 33005
|
Ma, LH; Ma, SY; Tang, QS; Sun, MM; Yan, HZ; Yuan, XL; Tian, W; Chen, YF Environmental regulation effect on the different technology innovation-based the empirical analysis(2024)Plos One, 19.0, 1 | |
| 30377
|
Wang, LP; Long, Y; Li, C Research on the impact mechanism of heterogeneous environmental regulation on enterprise green technology innovation(2022) | |
| 68296
|
Ying, Y; Jin, SY Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Green Technological Innovation: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance and Environmental Information Disclosure(2024)Sustainability, 16, 7 | |
| 34991
|
Nie, GQ; Zhu, YF; Wu, WP; Xie, WH; Wu, KX Impact of Voluntary Environmental Regulation on Green Technological Innovation: Evidence From Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises(2022) | |
| 31281
|
Fang, J Environmental law, environmental policy stringency, and development of environmental technologies in China(2023)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 30, 45 | |
| 35623
|
Song, WF; Han, XF; Liu, QE Patterns of environmental regulation and green innovation in China(2024) | |
| 30240
|
Qu, F; Xu, L; Chen, YF Can Market-Based Environmental Regulation Promote Green Technology Innovation? Evidence from China(2022) |