| Title | Circular economy: Preserving materials or products? Introducing the Resource States framework |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 3171 |
| Authors | Blomsma, F; Tennant, M |
| Title | Circular economy: Preserving materials or products? Introducing the Resource States framework |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | This paper draws on material entropy and life cycle thinking to develop the Resource States framework. This framework clarifies and systematises the language around resources within the circular economy (CE) discourse, such that insights from different tools and approaches that investigate different aspects of CE can be aggregated and a more comprehensive picture of complex circular systems can be compiled. Currently, progress of the CE discourse is hampered by a lack of a clear and systematic approach to what we refer to as the particle state and the product state. That is: whether to approach resource circulation from the perspective of elements, molecules or materials; or whether to adopt the perspective of products or finished goods. As these two perspectives are often implicit in current contributions to CE, we first articulate both approaches, before assessing their respective contributions and limitations. Next, we draw on material entropy and life cycle thinking to integrate both perspectives and develop a more comprehensive way of conceptualising resource states, in the form of the Resource States framework. We furthermore present how this framework can be used A) to clearly distinguish between circular strategies, as well as between different implementation scenarios of the same circular strategy; B) to systematically explore and map synergies and trade-offs between combinations of circular strategies; and C) to link circular strategies with structural waste present in a given context. Lastly, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the framework and reflect on how it advances the CE field. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
5593
|
Schüpfer, D; Wagner-Wenz, R; Hendrich, K; Weidenkaff, A Materials come around and go around: Adapting to nature's circularity(2023)Mrs Bulletin, 48, 11 | |
| 3628
|
Velenturf, APM; Archer, SA; Gomes, HI; Christgen, B; Lag-Brotons, AJ; Purnell, P Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources(2019) | |
| 20915
|
Thakker, V; Bakshi, BR Toward sustainable circular economies: A computational framework for assessment and design(2021) | |
| 3844
|
Zotti, J; Bigano, A Write circular economy, read economy's circularity. How to avoid going in circles(2019)Economia Politica, 36, 2 | |
| 4083
|
Moreau, V; Sahakian, M; van Griethuysen, P; Vuille, F Coming Full Circle Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy(2017)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 21, 3 | |
| 28765
|
Blomsma, F; Brennan, G The Emergence of Circular Economy A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity(2017)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 21.0, 3 | |
| 4577
|
Kara, S; Hauschild, M; Sutherland, J; McAloone, T Closed-loop systems to circular economy: A pathway to environmental sustainability?(2022)Cirp Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 71, 2 | |
| 2133
|
Zhao, B; Yu, ZQ; Wang, HZ; Shuai, CY; Qu, S; Xu, M Data Science Applications in Circular Economy: Trends, Status, and Future(2024)Environmental Science & Technology, 58, 15 | |
| 1568
|
Stephan, G Circular Economy: Illusion or First Step towards a Sustainable Economy: A Physico-Economic Perspective(2022)Sustainability, 14, 8 | |
| 2362
|
Nilsen, HR The hierarchy of resource use for a sustainable circular economy(2019)International Journal Of Social Economics, 47, 1 |