| Title | Integration of ecological innovation, institutional governance, and human capital development for a sustainable environment in Asian Countries |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 31820 |
| Authors | Yu, ZC; Guo, XD |
| Title | Integration of ecological innovation, institutional governance, and human capital development for a sustainable environment in Asian Countries |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The study evaluates the dynamic influence of institutional quality, green innovation, and human capital on the ecological footprint in South Asian countries from 1990 to 2018. For empirical estimation of panel data, the study applied the cross-section autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) estimator to address the issues of cross-section dependency and slope heterogeneity. The long-run findings reveal that institutional governance and ecological innovation reduce the ecological footprint. Likewise, human development decreases the ecological footprint. The short-run outcomes are identical to the long-run; however, the short-run estimates' magnitude is smaller than the long-run. The results also support the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in the long run. The error correction term (ECT) with a significant negative value endorsed the conversion towards the long-run equilibrium position with a 26.5% annual adjustment rate in case of short-run deviation. The augmented mean group estimator ensures the robustness of estimates. The findings recommend that South Asian economies should promote green technology and human capital through R&D allocations in industrial and academic sectors. |
| https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2022.2155681 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
31835
|
Li, HM; Xu, RZ Impact of fiscal policies and natural resources on ecological sustainability of BRICS region: Moderating role of green innovation and ecological governance(2023) | |
| 35662
|
Amin, N; Shabbir, MS; Song, HM; Farrukh, MU; Iqbal, S; Abbass, K A step towards environmental mitigation: Do green technological innovation and institutional quality make a difference?(2023) | |
| 30172
|
Yikun, Z; Leong, LW; Cong, PT; Abu-Rumman, A; Al Shraah, A; Hishan, SS Green growth, governance, and green technology innovation. How effective towards SDGs in G7 countries?(2022) | |
| 33163
|
Wang, L; Ye, FY; Lin, JL; Bibi, N Exploring the impact of climate technology, financial inclusion and renewable energy on ecological footprint: Evidence from top polluted economies(2024)Plos One, 19.0, 4 | |
| 62740
|
Yang, CJ; Qi, HR; Jia, LJ; Wang, YJ; Huang, D Impact of digital technologies and financial development on green growth: Role of mineral resources, institutional quality, and human development in South Asia(2024) | |
| 31674
|
Chen, J; Huang, SJ; Ajaz, T Natural resources management and technological innovation under EKC framework: A glimmer of hope for sustainable environment in newly industrialized countries(2022) | |
| 33264
|
Dahmani, M Environmental quality and sustainability: exploring the role of environmental taxes, environment-related technologies, and R&D expenditure(2024)Environmental Economics And Policy Studies, 26.0, 2 | |
| 69618
|
Jain, M; Nagpal, A Relationship Between Environmental Sustainability and Human Development Index: A Case of Selected South Asian Nations(2019)Vision-The Journal Of Business Perspective, 23.0, 2 | |
| 31511
|
Ahakwa, I; Xu, Y; Tackie, EA; Odai, LA; Sarpong, FA; Korankye, B; Ofori, EK Do natural resources and green technological innovation matter in addressing environmental degradation? Evidence from panel models robust to cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity(2023) | |
| 30788
|
Javed, A; Rapposelli, A; Khan, F; Javed, A; Abid, N Do green technology innovation, environmental policy, and the transition to renewable energy matter in times of ecological crises? A step towards ecological sustainability(2024) |