| Title | Research on the Performance Path of Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity in the Context of High-Quality Development-Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 31868 |
| Authors | Feng, YH; Cheng, XY; Liu, RH |
| Title | Research on the Performance Path of Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity in the Context of High-Quality Development-Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | Sustainability, 16, 1 |
| Abstract | Improving industrial green total factor productivity (GTFP) is essential for achieving high-quality industrial development in China. To explore this perspective, we examined 30 provinces as case samples and applied a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis in order to analyze the factors of technological innovation, human capital, green consumption, environmental regulation, the Internet, and external openness in relation to industrial GTFP. The findings of this study show that the configuration path of industrial GTFP has multiple concurrencies. Specifically, three paths were identified as leading to high industrial GTFP, namely, the "total factor type", "open-technology drive type", and "technology-human drive type". Meanwhile, the two configuration paths of non-high-industrial GTFP displayed an asymmetric relationship. Overall, these findings are crucial in revealing the path to improving industrial GTFP and achieving high-quality industrial development in China. The "total-factor-type" and "open-technology-drive-type" paths were the most prevalent in the eastern region, while the central area leaned more towards the "technology-human drive type". This study offers valuable recommendations and insights for policymakers and scholars interested in promoting the development of industrial GTFP. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/412/pdf?version=1704255337 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
30813
|
Li, PP; Bi, P Study on the Regional Differences and Promotion Models of Green Technology Innovation Performance in China: Based on Entropy Weight Method and Fuzzy Set-Qualitative Comparative Analysis(2020) | |
| 31499
|
Shi, XA; Li, LS Green total factor productivity and its decomposition of Chinese manufacturing based on the MML index:2003-2015(2019) | |
| 30560
|
Qu, XY; Qin, XT; Hu, HC Research on the Improvement Path of Regional Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in China Based on fsQCA Method(2023)Sustainability, 15, 4 | |
| 33745
|
Xiao, SY; Wang, SS; Zeng, FH; Huang, WC Spatial Differences and Influencing Factors of Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Industries(2022)Sustainability, 14.0, 15 | |
| 34937
|
Jin, YY; Ye, GY Regional Green Innovation Path Selection in China's Complex Environment: An fsQCA Exploration(2024)Polish Journal Of Environmental Studies, 33, 5 | |
| 30800
|
Mingkai, Z; Xinlan, C; Guangming, Y Coupling coordination degree and influencing factors of green science and technology innovation efficiency and digital economy level: Evidence from provincial panel data in China(2023) | |
| 31642
|
Lee, CC; Zeng, ML; Wang, CS Environmental regulation, innovation capability, and green total factor productivity: New evidence from China(2022)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 29, 26 | |
| 31783
|
Cui, HR; Wang, HR; Zhao, QZ Which factors stimulate industrial green total factor productivity growth rate in China? An industrial aspect(2019)Greenhouse Gases-Science And Technology, 9, 3 | |
| 33164
|
Chen, CF; Lan, QX; Gao, M; Sun, YW Green Total Factor Productivity Growth and Its Determinants in China's Industrial Economy(2018)Sustainability, 10.0, 4 | |
| 31308
|
Wang, B; Gong, SY; Yang, Y Innovation, global competitiveness, and green total factor productivity: evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative region?(2023)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 30, 38 |