| Title | Environmental Regulation, Urban-Rural Income Gap and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 32035 |
| Authors | Ma, GQ; Lv, DY; Luo, YX; Jiang, TB |
| Title | Environmental Regulation, Urban-Rural Income Gap and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Sustainability, 14, 15 |
| Abstract | Environmental regulation is the basis for achieving green agricultural development, and urban-rural integration is the key to optimizing the allocation of agricultural elements and achieving sustainable agricultural development. This paper aims to investigate the spatial spillover effect of environmental regulation on China's agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP) and examine the mediating effect of the urban-rural income gap. Both the Super-SBM-DEA model and the Global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index are used to account for the AGTFP of China's 30 provinces, and the spatial Durbin model and the mediating effect model are used to analyze the impact of environmental regulation. We found that firstly, during the sample period, China's AGTFP has increased with an average annual growth rate of 3.27%, which is mainly promoted by agricultural green technology progress (AGTC). Secondly, both the direct and spatial effects of environmental regulation on AGTFP show a significant "U"-shaped feature and have regional heterogeneity based on differences in economic development levels and factor endowments. Thirdly, there is an "inverted U"-shaped relationship between environmental regulation and the urban-rural income gap, and the urban-rural income gap negatively affects AGTFP. Based on the empirical results, we propose that the Chinese government should pay attention to green technology innovation, break the market segmentation, promote urban-rural integration, and then promote the AGTFP. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/8995/pdf?version=1659493103 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
30397
|
Ma, YH; Lin, T; Xiao, QF The Relationship between Environmental Regulation, Green-Technology Innovation and Green Total-Factor Productivity-Evidence from 279 Cities in China(2022)International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 19, 23 | |
| 35253
|
Fan, M; Yang, P; Li, Q Impact of environmental regulation on green total factor productivity: a new perspective of green technological innovation(2022)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 29, 35 | |
| 32993
|
Mao, JH; Wu, Q; Zhu, MH; Lu, CP Effects of Environmental Regulation on Green Total Factor Productivity: An Evidence from the Yellow River Basin, China(2022)Sustainability, 14.0, 4 | |
| 35741
|
Zheng, H; Wu, SF; Zhang, Y; He, Y Environmental regulation effect on green total factor productivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt(2023) | |
| 31648
|
Shi, XY; Xu, YZ; Wu, GH Does the construction of rural multifunctional community in China improve agricultural green total factor productivity?(2024) | |
| 31839
|
Xu, P; Jin, ZH; Ye, XX; Wang, C RETRACTED: Efficiency Measurement and Spatial Spillover Effect of Green Agricultural Development in China (Retracted Article)(2022) | |
| 30678
|
Dong, ZQ; He, YD; Wang, H; Wang, LH Is there a ripple effect in environmental regulation in China? - Evidence from the local-neighborhood green technology innovation perspective(2020) | |
| 30111
|
Sun, YC Environmental regulation, agricultural green technology innovation, and agricultural green total factor productivity(2022) | |
| 30342
|
Wang, HR; Cui, HR; Zhao, QZ Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: Evidence from spatial durbin model analysis(2021) | |
| 32910
|
Hu, JF; Zhang, XF; Wang, TT Spatial Spillover Effects of Resource Misallocation on the Green Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Agriculture(2022)International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 19.0, 23 |