| Title | Perspective Life cycle thinking and safe-and-sustainable-by-design approaches for the battery innovation landscape |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 32485 |
| Authors | Soeteman-Hernández, LG; Blanco, CF; Koese, M; Sips, AJAM; Noorlander, CW; Peijnenburg, WJGM |
| Title | Perspective Life cycle thinking and safe-and-sustainable-by-design approaches for the battery innovation landscape |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Iscience, 26, 3 |
| Abstract | Developments in battery technology are essential for the energy transition and need to follow the framework for safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) materials, chemicals, products, and processes as set by the EU. SSbD is a broad approach that ensures that chemicals/advanced materials/products/services are produced and used in a way to avoid harm to humans and the environment. Technical and policy-related literature was surveyed for battery technologies and recommendations were provided for a broad SSbD approach that remains firmly grounded in Life Cycle Thinking principles. The approach integrates functional performance and sustainability (safety, social, environmental, and economic) aspects throughout the life cycle of materials, products, and processes, and evaluates how their interactions reflect on SSbD parameters. 22 different types of batteries were analyzed in a life cycle thinking approach for criticality, toxicity/safety, environmental and social impact, circularity, functionality, and cost to ensure battery innovation has a green and sustainable purpose to avoid unintended consequences. |
| http://www.cell.com/article/S2589004223001372/pdf |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
64582
|
Paul, D; Pechancová, V; Saha, N; Pavelková, D; Saha, N; Motiei, M; Jamatia, T; Chaudhuri, M; Ivanichenko, A; Venher, M; Hrbácková, L; Sáha, P Life cycle assessment of lithium-based batteries: Review of sustainability dimensions(2024) | |
| 22575
|
Díaz-Ramírez, MC; Ferreira, VJ; García-Armingol, T; López-Sabirón, AM; Ferreira, G Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0(2020)Sustainability, 12.0, 1 | |
| 23080
|
Ellis, TW; Howes, JA Accelerating Life-Cycle Management Protocols for New Generation Batteries(2017) | |
| 15548
|
Patel, AN; Lander, L; Ahuja, J; Bulman, J; Lum, JKH; Pople, JOD; Hales, A; Patel, Y; Edge, JS Lithium-ion battery second life: pathways, challenges and outlook(2024) | |
| 12656
|
Longo, S; Cellura, M; Cusenza, MA; Guarino, F; Mistretta, M; Panno, D; D'Urso, C; Leonardi, SG; Briguglio, N; Tumminia, G; Antonucci, V; Ferraro, M Life Cycle Assessment for Supporting Eco-Design: The Case Study of Sodium-Nickel Chloride Cells(2021)Energies, 14.0, 7 | |
| 22778
|
Doose, S; Mayer, JK; Michalowski, P; Kwade, A Challenges in Ecofriendly Battery Recycling and Closed Material Cycles: A Perspective on Future Lithium Battery Generations(2021)Metals, 11.0, 2 | |
| 10162
|
Akasapu, U; Hehenberger, P A design process model for battery systems based on existing life cycle assessment results(2023) | |
| 4390
|
Silvestri, L; Forcina, A; Silvestri, C; Arcese, G; Falcone, D Exploring the Environmental Benefits of an Open-Loop Circular Economy Strategy for Automotive Batteries in Industrial Applications(2024)Energies, 17, 7 | |
| 22629
|
Tran, HP; Schaubroeck, T; Swart, P; Six, L; Coonen, P; Dewulf, J Recycling portable alkaline/ZnC batteries for a circular economy: An assessment of natural resource consumption from a life cycle and criticality perspective(2018) | |
| 22681
|
Rajaeifar, MA; Ghadimi, P; Raugei, M; Wu, YF; Heidrich, O Challenges and recent developments in supply and value chains of electric vehicle batteries: A sustainability perspective(2022) |