| Title | Who should lead raw materials collection considering regulatory pressure and technological innovation? |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 33103 |
| Authors | Zhang, CH; Lyu, RX; Li, ZT; MacMillen, SJ |
| Title | Who should lead raw materials collection considering regulatory pressure and technological innovation? |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Government regulations have increased pressure on emissions-producing manufacturers. Due to regulatory pressure, manufacturers begin to invest in green technologies to reduce emissions, and collect end-of-life products as recycled raw materials. This paper analyzes who should lead raw materials collection, the manufacturer, the retailer or the third-party Internet recycling platform, from the perspectives of environmental benefit, economic benefit and social welfare. Among three collection models, the third-party incorporates technological innovation to filter and classify recycled products according to quality. Our results suggest, firstly, regulatory pressure serves as an effective emission-curbing measure in the forward logistics. Secondly, the effect of emission reduction investment under the third party-led collection is superior to that under the other two collection models. Thirdly, from the perspective of economic benefit, the optimal recycling channel for manufacturers is related to the fixed cost of establishing a recycling channel. From the perspectives of environmental benefit and social welfare, the third party-led collection is the optimal strategy. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
24316
|
He, JX; Yan, W; Li, YW; Lu, DL Recycling and/or reusing: when product innovation meets the recast of WEEE direct(2024)International Journal Of Production Research, 62, 19 | |
| 32754
|
Lyu, RX; Zhang, CH; Li, ZT; Li, YT Manufacturers' integrated strategies for emission reduction and recycling: The role of government regulations(2022) | |
| 6945
|
Liao, BF; Shang, YC; Sun, YY Optimal decisions of closed-loop supply chain under government recycling subsidy and value co-creation(2023) | |
| 6150
|
Larrain, M; Billen, P; Van Passel, S The effect of plastic packaging recycling policy interventions as a complement to extended producer responsibility schemes: A partial equilibrium model(2022) | |
| 71108
|
Li, MG; Wang, TY Recycling Strategy of Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Under Urban and Rural Low-Carbon Planning(2023)Ecological Chemistry And Engineering S-Chemia I Inzynieria Ekologiczna S, 30.0, 4 | |
| 13665
|
Sun, HX; Li, H Pricing strategies for end-of-life vehicle regarding reward-penalty mechanism and customers' environmental awareness(2024)Rairo-Operations Research, 58, 1 | |
| 10651
|
Tan, Y; Guo, CX Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment(2019)Sustainability, 11, 3 | |
| 6231
|
Favot, M; Grassetti, L; Massarutto, A; Veit, R Regulation and competition in the extended producer responsibility models: Results in the WEEE sector in Europe(2022) | |
| 75530
|
Handa, N; Singh, SR; Katariya, C A reverse Logistics Inventory Model with Consideration of Carbon Tax Policy, Imperfect Production, and Partial Backlogging Under a Sustainable Supply Chain(2024)Process Integration And Optimization For Sustainability, 8, 3 | |
| 3286
|
Mayanti, B; Helo, P Circular economy through waste reverse logistics under extended producer responsibility in Finland(2024)Waste Management & Research, 42, 1 |