| Title | Does China's carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efficiency?-an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover effects |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 33570 |
| Authors | Zhang, XM; Lu, FF; Xue, D |
| Title | Does China's carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efficiency?-an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover effects |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 29.0, 14 |
| Abstract | Carbon emission trading policy is of great importance for addressing climate change and reducing carbon emissions. Reducing carbon emissions could further affect energy efficiency (EE). Based on the data from 30 provinces in China from 2006 to 2017, this paper first calculated EE by using the super slack-based model (Super-SBM) and then analysed the theoretical mechanism of the impact of carbon emission trading policy on EE. We also used a difference-in-difference (DID) model and mediation effect model for empirical analysis. Finally, we established the spatial difference-in-difference (SDID) model to test the policy spillover effects of carbon emission trading policy. The results showed that the high EE areas have gradually shifted to the central and eastern regions during 2006-2017 in China. The EE value in the pilot area of the carbon emission trading policy was obviously higher than that in the non-pilot area. Carbon emission trading policy had a significant positive effect on improving EE overall. In particular, green technology innovation and energy structure both had positive mediation effects on carbon emission trading policy affecting EE. However, the industrial structuring adjustment had no significant mediation effect in its influencing mechanism. Additionally, the spatial spillover effects test showed that the carbon emission trading policy had a positive effect on the EE of the pilot areas but a negative effect on that of the non-pilot areas. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
33327
|
Gao, D; Tan, LF; Mo, XL; Xiong, RC Blue Sky Defense for Carbon Emission Trading Policies: A Perspective on the Spatial Spillover Effects of Total Factor Carbon Efficiency(2023)Systems, 11.0, 8 | |
| 33586
|
Du, MZ; Wu, FE; Ye, DF; Zhao, YT; Liao, LP Exploring the effects of energy quota trading policy on carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China(2023) | |
| 31655
|
Zhang, MM; Ge, YQ; Liu, LY; Zhou, DQ Impacts of carbon emission trading schemes on the development of renewable energy in China: Spatial spillover and mediation paths(2022) | |
| 33670
|
Yu, WL; Luo, JL Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China(2022)International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 19.0, 19 | |
| 32415
|
Liu, LL; Lv, YY; Gao, D; Mo, XL Towards a greener future: Assessing the impact of carbon emission trading on urban carbon efficiency in China(2023) | |
| 30994
|
Pang, GQ; Ding, ZQ; Shen, XY Spillover effect of energy intensity reduction targets on carbon emissions in China(2023) | |
| 32876
|
Wang, K; Su, X; Wang, S How does the energy-consuming rights trading policy affect China's carbon emission intensity?(2023) | |
| 35619
|
Xu, L; Fan, MT; Yang, LL; Shao, S Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level(2021) | |
| 32723
|
Li, XQ; Zheng, ZJ; Shi, DQ; Han, XF; Zhao, MZ New urbanization and carbon emissions intensity reduction: Mechanisms and spatial spillover effects(2023) | |
| 30623
|
Cai, AX; Zheng, SY; Cai, LH; Yang, HM; Comite, U How Does Green Technology Innovation Affect Carbon Emissions? A Spatial Econometric Analysis of China's Provincial Panel Data(2021) |