| Title | Structural limits to sustainable development: managers and progressive agency |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 34440 |
| Authors | Springett, D |
| Title | Structural limits to sustainable development: managers and progressive agency |
| Year | 2005 |
| Published | International Journal Of Innovation And Sustainable Development, 1, 1-2 |
| Abstract | The 'contradiction' inherent in sustainable development has produced a discursive struggle between two paradigms. The 'business case' for sustainable development frames the concept as a narrative of eco-modernism that fails to contest the structural bases of unsustainability. The competing radical discourse constructs sustainable development as having emancipatory power to produce a more ecologically rational and socially just metanarrative, challenging the dominant model of economic rationality. Investigations in the area of innovation and sustainable development need to take account of this contestation that revolves around institutional and structural limits that have become normalised to the extent that they sometimes escape examination. This has implications for the awareness, education and level of agency of managers in capitalist organisations. A research inquiry conducted in New Zealand revealed that the 'business case' represented the major discursive formation around sustainable development, chiefly promoted by a coalition of government and business interests, although this model and the radical paradigm were both contested by neo-liberal groups. Corporate managers conceived the 'business case' as their chief means of exercising agency to negotiate the meaning of sustainable development in the workplace; although the research discourse opened up a conceptual space where counter-hegemonic positions addressing the structural limits to sustainable development and the limitations to the 'business case' began to emerge. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
68974
|
Powell, L; Tilt, C The examination of power and politics in a conservation organisation(2017)Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30, 3 | |
| 71750
|
Bouglet, J; Joffre, O; Simon, E How to reconcile business with sustainable development: an innovation approach(2012)Society And Business Review, 7.0, 3 | |
| 66919
|
Sidhu, AM; Gibbon, J Institutionalisation of weak conceptions of sustainability in the United Nations Clean Development Mechanism: empirical evidence from Malaysian organisations(2021)Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34, 5 | |
| 34655
|
DesJardins, J Is it Time to Jump off the Sustainability Bandwagon?(2016)Business Ethics Quarterly, 26, 1 | |
| 73002
|
Theodoro, SH; Leonardos, OH The Unsustainable Sustainability(2021)Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias, 93, 1 | |
| 17720
|
Crawley, S; Dinica, V Institutionalising environmental sustainability transitions in New Zealand and Australia: Introduction to the special issue(2021)Political Science, 73, 2 | |
| 13218
|
Caldera, HTS; Desha, C; Dawes, L Evaluating the enablers and barriers for successful implementation of sustainable business practice in 'lean' SMEs(2019) | |
| 70141
|
Abramovich, N; Vasiliu, A Sustainability as fairness: A Ralwsian framework linking intergenerational equity and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) with business practices(2023)Sustainable Development, 31, 3 | |
| 74328
|
Haldar, S Towards a conceptual understanding of sustainability-driven entrepreneurship(2019)Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 26, 6 | |
| 67047
|
Lahtinen, S; Yrjölä, M Managing sustainability transformations: A managerial framing approach(2019) |