| Title | Dynamic path for green product development: A game-theoretic analysis of product-process innovation with supply chain collaboration |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 35711 |
| Authors | Wan, MY; Xu, JL; Li, CH; Liu, J |
| Title | Dynamic path for green product development: A game-theoretic analysis of product-process innovation with supply chain collaboration |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Two contrasting paths are embraced within the practice of green product development: The first involves market entry with high-quality products in the initial phase, followed by a gradual release of mass-market products at reduced prices. The second entails entering the market with low-quality products, followed by step-by-step improvements in quality. The decision-making on path selection is divided into two stages: in the first stage, firms choose green product technologies, and in the second stage, they determine the path for green product development based on the selected technologies. Our research findings highlight the crucial role of efficiencycost ratios in product-process innovation for green product development. Equilibriums are only achievable when efficiency-cost ratios are relatively low. Given the singular impact of component cost on profit, the path for process innovation consistently trends downward, whereas the path for product innovation can either descend or ascend. Collaboration positively impacts the conditions for equilibrium existence, making it more attainable. When the manufacturer's efficiency-cost ratio for product innovation is low, collaboration can transition the path from a descending trend to an ascending one, and vice versa. The selection of appropriate technological parameters is important for achieving a win-win relationship between the environment and profitability. Additionally, we have expanded our models to include competition and marketing scenarios. We find that competition primarily influences green product development by altering the motivation for path selection. Marketing and product-process innovation demonstrate a complementary relationship. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
35380
|
Liu, W; Han, HS; Hou, PW; Li, HM To collaborate or not? Analysis of competitive manufacturers' green innovation strategy toward sustainability(2024)Managerial And Decision Economics, 45, 4 | |
| 30748
|
Zou, YJ; He, DY; Sun, R Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Innovation in Green Technology among Supply Chain Enterprises Based on Cost Sharing and Market Competition(2024)Sustainability, 16, 15 | |
| 35136
|
Zhang, FF; Zhang, ZX; Xue, YW; Zhang, J; Che, Y Dynamic Green Innovation Decision of the Supply Chain with Innovating and Free-Riding Manufacturers: Cooperation and Spillover(2020) | |
| 35704
|
Dugoua, E; Dumas, M Green product innovation in industrial networks: A theoretical model(2021) | |
| 5317
|
Li, G; Wu, HM; Sethi, SP; Zhang, X Contracting green product supply chains considering marketing efforts in the circular economy era(2021) | |
| 35223
|
Xue, J; Swan, KS Green exploration and exploitation: Capabilities, product advantage, and policy considerations(2023)Creativity And Innovation Management, 32, 3 | |
| 12928
|
Liu, S; Yu, JJ; Feng, TJ The impact of green innovations on firm's sustainable operations: Process innovation and recycling innovation(2025) | |
| 30275
|
Liang, YJ; Liang, X; Wei, H Differential Game Study of Competitive Green Supply Chain Based on Green Public Technology Innovation and Product Greenness(2023) | |
| 31128
|
Jiang, SJ; Ye, F; Lin, Q Managing green innovation investment in a Co-opetitive supply chain under capital constraint(2021) | |
| 35724
|
Noci, G; Verganti, R Managing 'green' product innovation in small firms(1999)R & D Management, 29, 1 |