| Title | A critical geographical analysis of the smart city concept - theoretical background and possible research directions |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 35916 |
| Authors | Adám, S |
| Title | A critical geographical analysis of the smart city concept - theoretical background and possible research directions |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Ter Es Tarsadalom, 34, 2 |
| Abstract | The smart city concept has recently become a popular topic in urban studies. It can be argued, that the creation of smart cities is a new, 21st century chapter of urban policy and spatial development, dominated by market-oriented, neoliberal ideology. The concept is formed by several stakeholders, such as innovators and investors, policymakers and last but not least smart citizens, who supposedly can discover new ways of living and interacting. it is commonly assumed, that the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) is the backbone of the smart city idea, but there is no conceptual clarity regarding the concept because of its complexity. This paper aims to give deeper insights into the theoretical background of smart city, presenting the most important characteristics and critics of the concept, based on an international literature review. First, I collect and describe the essential components and the most common definitions of the smarty city concept. Afterwards, I put smart cities in the context of neoliberal urban policy, investigating the interests and power relations behind the concept. Furthermore, I identify critical junctures in evolving smart city discourses; these shed light on the issue that the smart city concept cannot be considered as a one-size-fits-all solution to urban problems. In addition, commodification of urban space, surveillance and control of urban life, favouring business-led technological solutions rather than political bargaining and long-term urban planning, might contribute to growing social and territorial disparities. The critical analysis of the smart city concept raises further research questions about the way the concept can be understood in different geographical contexts, shedding light on the main reasons and barriers to become a smart city. The analysis indicates a need for more empirical research as the broader social and spatial effects of implementing the concept are still largely unexplored, especially in Hungary. |
| https://tet.rkk.hu/index.php/TeT/article/download/3201/5270 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
36162
|
Verrest, H; Pfeffer, K Elaborating the urbanism in smart urbanism: distilling relevant dimensions for a comprehensive analysis of Smart City approaches(2019)Information Communication & Society, 22, 9 | |
| 43103
|
Baji, P Smart cities and their domains - Future challenges for urban researchers?(2017)Ter Es Tarsadalom, 31, 1 | |
| 45089
|
Papa, R; Gargiulo, C; Galderisi, A Towards An Urban Planners' Perspective On Smart City(2013)Tema-Journal Of Land Use Mobility And Environment, 6, 1 | |
| 35865
|
Rodó, MT Experimenting With The Urban: Politics, Discourses And Practices Of The Smart City And Datification(2019)Athenea Digital, 19, 2 | |
| 39204
|
Jakutyte-Walangitang, D; Page, J; Pol, O; Schmidt, RR; Mollay, U Contribution to the Knowledge Development for Smart Cities(2015) | |
| 45339
|
Pourahmad, A; Ziari, K; Hataminejad, H; Pashabadi, SP Explanation of Concept and Features of a Smart City(2018)Bagh-E Nazar, 15, 58 | |
| 38861
|
Indraprahasta, GS; Alamsyah, P Smart cities in developing countries: a review of research literature(2024) | |
| 45699
|
El Hendy, M; Miniaoui, S; Atalla, S; Bin Hashim, KF A Survey on Smart City Technologies, Initiatives and Global Technology Providers(2017) | |
| 44842
|
Dameri, RP; Rosenthal-Sabroux, C Smart City and Value Creation(2014) | |
| 45264
|
Allahham, A The Smart City: From Modern Power to Smart Power(2021)Journal Of Architecture And Planning -King Saud University, 33, 4 |