| Title | Evaluating Collaborative Public-Private Partnerships The Case of Toronto's Smart City |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 36022 |
| Authors | Nelischer, K |
| Title | Evaluating Collaborative Public-Private Partnerships The Case of Toronto's Smart City |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | Journal Of The American Planning Association, 90, 2 |
| Abstract | Problem, research strategy, and findingsPublic-private partnership models designed to facilitate greater collaboration have become increasingly popular. Scholarship on these partnerships has shown that they rely less on contracts and more on trust between partners, engage private partners early to allow for participation in project visioning, and prioritize shared decision making. However, there is a need to further define collaborative partnerships and distinguish them from more conventional models. In addition, research into the impacts of collaborative partnerships within planning processes is limited, and additional insights into their administrative structures, management, and internal dynamics is needed. I respond to these gaps by analyzing the collaborative co-creation public-private partnership formed to plan a smart city in the Quayside district of Toronto (Canada). Drawing on interviews (N = 35), participant observation, and document analysis, I found that those qualities of the Quayside partnership typical of collaborative partnership models reduced governmental oversight, facilitated conflicts of interest, and afforded the private partner substantial power. The challenges precipitated by the partnership structure were amplified through its application in a smart city context, where the private partner was a technology corporation with expansive resources and ambitions. Based on these findings, I argue that collaborative partnerships pose significant risks of privatizing planning processes and that these risks are heightened when asymmetries between partners are particularly stark.Takeaway for practicePlanners should not allow a desire for greater collaboration to overshadow the necessity of divisions between public and private roles, because tension between the two is vital to partnership success. If seeking deeper collaboration, planners should ensure that responsibilities are clearly detailed in contracts to avoid ambiguities or conflicts of interest. This is especially important in projects where power differentials between partners are too significant to rely solely on trust instead of contracts. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
35928
|
Siokas, G; Kelaidi, V; Tsakanikas, A The smart city as a hub for nourishing public-private partnerships(2022) | |
| 45137
|
Clement, J; Manjon, M; Crutzen, N Factors for collaboration amongst smart city stakeholders: A local government perspective(2022)Government Information Quarterly, 39, 4 | |
| 37778
|
Liu, TT; Mostafa, S; Mohamed, S; Nguyen, TS Emerging themes of public-private partnership application in developing smart city projects: a conceptual framework(2021)Built Environment Project And Asset Management, 11.0, 1 | |
| 45586
|
Mills, DE; Izadgoshasb, I; Pudney, SG Smart City Collaboration: A Review and an Agenda for Establishing Sustainable Collaboration(2021)Sustainability, 13, 16 | |
| 39662
|
Zhang, N; Zhu, Z Understanding Factors and Mechanisms for Collaborative Governance Based on Smart Technologies(2019) | |
| 42210
|
Ojasalo, J; Kauppinen, H Collaborative Innovation with External Actors: An Empirical Study on Open Innovation Platforms in Smart Cities(2016)Technology Innovation Management Review, 6, 12 | |
| 38489
|
Liu, LN; Ju, JR; Feng, YQ; Hu, Q Impact of Governance Structure Characteristics of Public-private Partnerships on Smart City Project Success: Evidence from a Multi-case Study in China(2019) | |
| 35944
|
Thabit, S; Mora, L The collaboration dilemma in smart city projects: Time to ask the right questions(2023) | |
| 39488
|
Vrabie, C Smart Leadership - Examples Of Best Practices In Governing Smart Cities(2020) | |
| 39576
|
Ferraris, A; Giacosa, E; Bresciani, S Public-Private Alliances In Open Innovation Projects: The Governance Of Alliances In Smart Cities(2016) |