| Title | Activity types, thematic domains, and stakeholder constellations: explaining civil society involvement in Amsterdam's smart city |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 36086 |
| Authors | Rose, FM |
| Title | Activity types, thematic domains, and stakeholder constellations: explaining civil society involvement in Amsterdam's smart city |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | European Planning Studies, 30, 6 |
| Abstract | Smart city development increasingly involves civil society stakeholders (CSS) because they constitute legitimate stakeholders concerning digitalized urban public goods. As users, however, CSS are involved because they improve smart city activities by providing tacit day-to-day knowledge. Distinguishing between socially and economically orientated CSS allows us to compare the involvement of legitimate stakeholders to user involvement and to unravel the factors influencing the involvement of CSS in smart city activities. For this, we build a framework that not only discerns between socially- and economically-orientated CSS but also distinguishes between three types of socio-technical factors that either limit or increase civil society involvement in smart city activities: (1) the activity's type (2) the activity's thematic domain, and (3) stakeholder constellations linked to the activity. Using chi-square-tests and logistic regressions we inquire into how the socio-technical factors defined in our framework influence the involvement of social and economic CSS in Amsterdam's smart city activities. Our results show that the dominant thematic domains and the most common stakeholder constellations that characterize in Amsterdam's smart city activities limit the involvement of social CSS. CSS involvement in smart city activities thus mainly entails the involvement of economically-orientated CSS. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
45340
|
Rose, FM; Thiel, J; Grabher, G Selective inclusion: Civil society involvement in the smart city ecology of Amsterdam(2022)European Urban And Regional Studies, 29, 3 | |
| 43134
|
Farías, I; Widmer, S Ordinary Smart Cities How Calculated Users, Professional Citizens, Technology Companies and City Administrations Engage in a More-than-digital Politics(2017)Tecnoscienza-Italian Journal Of Science & Technology Studies, 8, 2 | |
| 39501
|
Simonofski, A; Vallé, T; Serral, E; Wautelet, Y Investigating context factors in citizen participation strategies: A comparative analysis of Swedish and Belgian smart cities(2021) | |
| 36631
|
Tomor, Z Citizens in the Smart City: What Is Actually Happening? An In-Depth Case Study From Utrecht, the Netherlands(2020)International Journal Of Public Administration In The Digital Age, 7, 1 | |
| 41045
|
Schliwa, G Smart Cities by Design? Interrogating Design Thinking for Citizen Participation(2019) | |
| 44054
|
Rafaj, O; Rehák, S; Cernenko, T Smart Cities - Overview of Citizen Participation across Application Domains(2022)Scientific Papers Of The University Of Pardubice-Series D-Faculty Of Economics And Administration, 30, 1 | |
| 45020
|
Breux, S; Diaz, J; Loiseau, H The Smart City - Does the Individual Matter?(2023)Journal Of Urban Technology, 30, 4 | |
| 37437
|
Vidiasova, L; Cronemberger, F Discrepancies in perceptions of smart city initiatives in Saint Petersburg, Russia(2020) | |
| 43103
|
Baji, P Smart cities and their domains - Future challenges for urban researchers?(2017)Ter Es Tarsadalom, 31, 1 | |
| 37992
|
Engelbert, J; van Zoonen, L; Hirzalla, F Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness(2019) |