| Title | Evaluation of the Smart Cities Listed in Smart City Index 2021 by Using Entropy Based Copras and Aras Methodology |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 36391 |
| Authors | Gelmez, E; Özceylan, E |
| Title | Evaluation of the Smart Cities Listed in Smart City Index 2021 by Using Entropy Based Copras and Aras Methodology |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Foundations Of Computing And Decision Sciences, 48, 2 |
| Abstract | Smart cities are included in the literature as a technology-based concept that has been on the agenda in recent years and whose framework is constantly changing with the changes in technology. There are different frameworks and indexes to define the smartness of a city. Smart City Index 2021 published by Institute for Management Development (IMD) and Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) is one of the accepted studies in the world. In the report of Smart City Index 2021, 118 cities are evaluated in five criteria namely health & safety, mobility, activities, opportunities (work & school) and governance. To re-evaluate the cities and compare the results, a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) process including Entropy based Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and Addivite Ratio Assessment (ARAS) methodology is applied in this paper. To prioritize the criteria, entropy weight method is used. 118 cities are ranked both technologically and structurally using the COPRAS and ARAS method. As a result of the analyses, according to these methods, the rankings of the smart cities are the same. Also, when technologically smart cities are listed, it is determined that the first three countries are Zhuhai, Shenzhen, Nanjing, and at the same time, Abu Dhabi, Chongqing, Hangzhou in terms of structurally. |
| https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/fcds-2023-0007 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
38222
|
Toh, CK Smart city indexes, criteria, indicators and rankings: An in-depth investigation and analysis(2022)Iet Smart Cities, 4, 3 | |
| 39434
|
Iryna, K; Iryna, U; Yevhen, P; Nataliia, D; Maxym, B Factors of Successful Development of Smart Cities(2022)International Journal Of Computer Science And Network Security, 22, 7 | |
| 75200
|
Ozkaya, G; Erdin, C Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique(2020)Heliyon, 6, 10 | |
| 35999
|
Sotirelis, P; Nakopoulos, P; Valvi, T; Grigoroudis, E; Carayannis, E Measuring Smart City Performance: a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Approach(2022)Journal Of The Knowledge Economy, 13, 4 | |
| 45276
|
Shen, LY; Huang, ZH; Wong, SW; Liao, SJ; Lou, YL A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China(2018) | |
| 42007
|
Zhang, Y; Zhang, YJ; Zhang, H; Zhang, YX Evaluation on new first-tier smart cities in China based on entropy method and TOPSIS(2022) | |
| 43125
|
Skvarciany, V; Jureviciene, D; Zitkiene, R; Lapinskaite, I; Dude, U A Different Approach to the Evaluation of Smart Cities' Indicators(2021)Taltech Journal Of European Studies, 11, 2 | |
| 39022
|
Liu, YJ; Ye, M RETRACTED: Analysis on the Development of Smart City of Big Cities in China and Its Effect to Economic Structure Based on Entropy Method (Retracted Article)(2022) | |
| 44962
|
Ependi, U; Rochim, AF; Wibowo, A Smart City Assessment for Sustainable City Development on Smart Governance: A Systematic Literature Review(2022) | |
| 37237
|
Shah, MN; Nagargoje, S; Shah, C Assessment of Ahmedabad (India) and Shanghai (China) on Smart City Parameters Applying the Boyd Cohen Smart City Wheel(2017) |