| Title | Assessing the sustainability of urban eco-systems through Emergy-based circular economy indicators |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 3668 |
| Authors | Santagata, R; Zucaro, A; Viglia, S; Ripa, M; Tian, X; Ulgiati, S |
| Title | Assessing the sustainability of urban eco-systems through Emergy-based circular economy indicators |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Circular Economy (CE) concepts and tools are getting increasing attention with regard to their implementation in agricultural, urban and industrial sectors towards innovative business models to optimize resource use, process performances and development policies. However, conventional biophysical and economic indicators hardly fit CE characteristics. Life cycle assessment, footprint and economic cost-benefit indicators, do not fully capture the specificity of a closed loop CE framework, characterized by feedbacks and resource use minimization and quality assessment Commonly used mono-dimensional indicators seem unable to successfully relate the process performance and the use of ecosystem services and natural capital, in that they do not assess the environmental quality and sustainability (renewability, fit to use, recycle potential) of resources and the complexity of interaction between agro/industrial/urban environments and socioeconomic systems, and translate into an incomplete and inadequate picture, far from an effective CE perspective. In this study, Emergy Accounting method (EMA) is used to design an improved approach to CE systemic aspects, focusing on the importance of new indicators capable of capturing both resource generation (upstream), product (downstream) and systems dimensions. This conceptual scheme is built around the case study of the City of Napoli's economy (Campania region, Southern Italy) considering the surrounding agro-industrial area with its smaller urban settlements. In order to design a reasonable and reliable CE framework, a number of already existing and innovative processes is analyzed and discussed, through a bottom-up procedure capable to account for CE development options based on the recovery of locally available and still usable resources (i.e., conversion of waste cooking oil into biodiesel, conversion of slaughterhouse residues to power and chemicals, recovery and conversion of agro-waste residues, amongst others). The result highlighted that EMA was capable to keep track of the improvement generated by the implemented circularity patterns in terms of reduced total emergy of the system. Moreover, EMA indicators suggested that, in any case, the CE business framework should be intended as a transitional strategy towards more feasible paradigms. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
3879
|
Alonso, IB; Sanchez-Rivero, MV; Pozas, BM Mapping sustainability and circular economy in cities: Methodological framework from europe to the Spanish case(2022) | |
| 2273
|
Li, JL; Sun, W; Song, HM; Li, RP; Hao, JQ Toward the construction of a circular economy eco-city: An emergy-based sustainability evaluation of Rizhao city in China(2021) | |
| 9709
|
Galychyn, O; Fath, BD; Shah, IH; Buonocore, E; Franzese, PP A multi-criteria framework for assessing urban socio-ecological systems: The emergy nexus of the urban economy and environment(2022) | |
| 11067
|
Caprioli, C; Oppio, A; Baldassarre, R; Grassi, R; Dell'Ovo, M A Multidimensional Assessment of Ecosystem Services: From Grey to Green Infrastructure(2021) | |
| 1138
|
Saidani, M; Yannou, B; Leroy, Y; Cluzel, F; Kendall, A A taxonomy of circular economy indicators(2019) | |
| 455
|
Joensuu, T; Edelman, H; Saari, A Circular economy practices in the built environment(2020) | |
| 4540
|
Ghisellini, P; Cialani, C; Ulgiati, S A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems(2016) | |
| 3145
|
Smol, M; Kulczycka, J; Avdiushchenko, A Circular economy indicators in relation to eco-innovation in European regions(2017)Clean Technologies And Environmental Policy, 19, 3 | |
| 3074
|
Harris, S; Martin, M; Diener, D Circularity for circularity's sake? Scoping review of assessment methods for environmental performance in the circular economy.(2021) | |
| 16154
|
dos Santos, LCT; Giannetti, BF; Agostinho, F; Almeida, CMVB Using the five sectors sustainability model to verify the relationship between circularity and sustainability(2022) |