| Title | Redefining smart city concept with resilience approach |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 36950 |
| Authors | Arafah, Y; Winarso, H |
| Title | Redefining smart city concept with resilience approach |
| Year | 2017 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The smart city concept originally aimed at dealing with various urban problems, in particular, those related to the urban environment and infrastructure, such as modeling transport flow in a city. As it developed, the concept is now widely used to accelerate the process of urban management by using IT technology and by the availability of big data. However, the smart city discourses are still debated. There is a number of critical literature on the discourses; some are more concerned with the use and development of information communication technology (ICT). ICT and modern technology are considered the key aspect of the smart city concept. Meanwhile, others emphasize the importance of the people who operate the technology. Very few, if any, literature emphasizes the importance of resilience in the smart city discourse. The city as a complex system should have the ability to be resilient, especially when technology fails either due to technical/man-made or natural disasters. This paper aims to redefine the smart city concept in urban planning through a literature study in the context of planning using a resilience approach. This paper describes and defines what the smart city concept is, what it means, as well as explains the relation and linkage of the importance of using resilience approach in defining the smart city. Factors of resilience will lead to a soft infrastructure approach, such as enhancement in many aspects, e.g. community capacity, social and human capital, knowledge inclusion, participation, social innovation, and social equity. Discussion and analysis are conducted through a deep literature study using systematic literature review methodology. |
| https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012065/pdf |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
38798
|
Samarakkody, A; Amaratunga, D; Haigh, R Characterising Smartness to Make Smart Cities Resilient(2022)Sustainability, 14, 19 | |
| 36265
|
Tzioutziou, A; Xenidis, Y A Study on the Integration of Resilience and Smart City Concepts in Urban Systems(2021)Infrastructures, 6, 2 | |
| 45339
|
Pourahmad, A; Ziari, K; Hataminejad, H; Pashabadi, SP Explanation of Concept and Features of a Smart City(2018)Bagh-E Nazar, 15, 58 | |
| 40903
|
Cañavera-Herrera, JS; Tang, JQ; Nochta, T; Schooling, JM On the relation between 'resilience' and 'smartness': A critical review(2022) | |
| 40353
|
Samarakkody, A; Amaratunga, D; Haigh, R Technological Innovations for Enhancing Disaster Resilience in Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Urban Scholar's Analysis(2023)Sustainability, 15, 15 | |
| 39622
|
Okonta, DE; Vukovic, V Smart cities software applications for sustainability and resilience(2024)Heliyon, 10, 12 | |
| 37767
|
de Falco, S; Angelidou, M; Addie, JPD From the "smart city" to the "smart metropolis"? Building resilience in the urban periphery(2019)European Urban And Regional Studies, 26.0, 2 | |
| 45442
|
Zhu, SY; Li, DZ; Feng, HB Is smart city resilient? Evidence from China(2019) | |
| 45699
|
El Hendy, M; Miniaoui, S; Atalla, S; Bin Hashim, KF A Survey on Smart City Technologies, Initiatives and Global Technology Providers(2017) | |
| 42958
|
Arafah, Y; Winarso, H; Suroso, DSA Towards Smart and Resilient City: A Conceptual Model(2018) |