| Title | Exploring services in a smart city through socio-technical design principles: Revealing five tensions in a smart living context |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 37201 |
| Authors | Axelsson, K; Melin, U; Granath, M |
| Title | Exploring services in a smart city through socio-technical design principles: Revealing five tensions in a smart living context |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | Government Information Quarterly, 41.0, 1 |
| Abstract | Smart cities have been studied for many years, but smart homes and the citizens' actual living in these smart homes are less researched. We argue that for digital government research, and for governments to be successful in smart city development in practice, it is necessary not only to understand living on a societal level, but also living aspects in the narrow context of homes. Citizens populate the smart city and are the ones who are supposed to use the services provided by the government. In this article we explore and analyze digital and analogue services in smart homes developed in a new city district. We have conducted observational studies in 53 apartments during an urban living expo which we analyze by applying a set of socio-technical design principles. The research question that guides the analysis is: "What tensions between values in digital and analogue services for a smart living can be revealed by a socio-technical perspective?". We identify five tensions between: 1) being in control and being controlled, 2) intended and undesirable use of personal data, 3) digital and analogue smartness, 4) smart home visions and practices, and 5) environmental and social sustainability. By revealing these tensions, we contribute to an understanding of the complexity of smart living. We also contribute by highlighting the importance of applying a perspective that captures both technology and citizen and user issues (i.e., social aspects) when developing services in the smart home context. |
| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101915 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
36440
|
Trencher, G Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges(2019) | |
| 40923
|
Golubchikov, O; Thornbush, MJ Smart Cities as Hybrid Spaces of Governance: Beyond the Hard/Soft Dichotomy in Cyber-Urbanization(2022)Sustainability, 14, 16 | |
| 42927
|
Martin, CJ; Evans, J; Karvonen, A Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America(2018) | |
| 40229
|
Pira, S The social issues of smart home: a review of four European cities' experiences(2021)European Journal Of Futures Research, 9, 1 | |
| 37426
|
Webster, CWR; Leleux, C Searching for the real sustainable smart city?(2019)Information Polity, 24.0, 3 | |
| 42213
|
Anttiroiko, AV; Valkama, P; Bailey, SJ Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services(2014)Ai & Society, 29, 3 | |
| 38967
|
Odendaal, N; Aurigi, A Digital Cities 10: Towards a localised socio-technical understanding of the 'real smart city(2017) | |
| 42625
|
McKenna, HP Is It All About Awareness? People, Smart Cities 3.0, and Evolving Spaces for IT(2016) | |
| 45325
|
Park, J; Yoo, S Evolution of the smart city: three extensions to governance, sustainability, and decent urbanisation from an ICT-based urban solution(2023) | |
| 43134
|
Farías, I; Widmer, S Ordinary Smart Cities How Calculated Users, Professional Citizens, Technology Companies and City Administrations Engage in a More-than-digital Politics(2017)Tecnoscienza-Italian Journal Of Science & Technology Studies, 8, 2 |