| Title | Smart city measurement with municipality and expert opinion in urban transformation areas: Istanbul-Esenler district |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 37208 |
| Authors | Mazlum, ZÖ; Ercoskun, ÖY |
| Title | Smart city measurement with municipality and expert opinion in urban transformation areas: Istanbul-Esenler district |
| Year | 2024 |
| Published | Journal Of The Faculty Of Engineering And Architecture Of Gazi University, 40.0, 1 |
| Abstract | In our cities, which are constantly changing and developing, sustainable development models should beimplemented in order to combat urban challenges such as rapid urbanization, migration, disasters, epidemics etc.Urban transformation applications, which came to the agenda with the Law No. 6306, are among the methods ofstruggling with difficulties. In order to construct and discuss the relationship between urban transformationapplication areas and smart city strategies, Esenler District, which came to the fore with its unplanned constructionand property problems, was chosen as the study area. Analytical hierarchy process was used to measure thesmartness potential of Esenler District, one of the largest districts in the Istanbul metropolitan area. In theworkshops and interviews held within the scope of the study, the problem areas and important concepts related to smart cities determined by the experts have made a great contribution to the measurement of the smartness potentialof Esenler District. The current situation of Esenler District, which has taken the first and major step towardsreaching smart cities in Turkey, has been revealed and it has been evaluated whether the district has sufficientinfrastructure for smart transformation. When the radar chart created as a result of the study is examined, it is seenthat the smart governance component received the highest score with 2.72 points. The smart life component is 2.40,the smart environment component is 2.24, the smart economy component is 2.04, the smart people component is1.90 and the smart mobility component is 1.88 points outs of 5.00 points. In this study, the reproduction of theareas, with smart solutions in Esenler, is discussed and the positive and negative aspects of the project planned tobe implemented are revealed |
| https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2551045 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
36702
|
Çakir, A; Karababa, EM; Erdemir, FT; Senik, B; Karaçor, EK Spatial Analysis for Smart City Approach: The Case of Besiktas-Etiler Neighborhood(2022) | |
| 38435
|
Özçandir, N; Can, SA Smart Home Study Within the Scope of Urban Transformation Project: Case of MAtchUP Antalya Project(2022) | |
| 45284
|
Bondarenko, NG; Oleynik, A; Biryukov, VA; Tarando, EE; Malinina, TB Smart City: Integration Of Information And Communication Technologies(2020) | |
| 37183
|
Danilina, N; Majorzadehzahiri, A Investigating the capability of Smart City in Tehran(2019) | |
| 39804
|
Kos, B Global Trends In Intelligent Development Of Urbanized Areas(2018) | |
| 44846
|
Paliaga, M; Oliva, E Trends In Applying The Smart City Concept(2018)Ekonomska Misao I Praksa-Economic Thought And Practice, 27, 2 | |
| 39216
|
Boz, Y; Cay, T How smart and sustainable are the cities in Turkiye? - National policies and the enthusiasm level of the local governments(2024)Heliyon, 10, 4 | |
| 39417
|
Chudiniva, O; Afonina, M Formation of "Urban planning" indicators for "Smart City" concept (on the example of SKOLKOVO, Moscow)(2018) | |
| 44857
|
Canitez, F; Deveci, M A Smart City Assessment Framework: The Case Of Istanbul'S Smart City Project(2018) | |
| 45139
|
Ates, M; Erinsel Önder, D The Concept of 'Smart City' and Criticism within the Context of its Transforming Meaning(2019)Megaron, 14, 1 |