| Title | Innovative public-private partnership to support Smart City: the case of "Chaire REVES" |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 37247 |
| Authors | Dupont, L; Morel, L; Guidat, C |
| Title | Innovative public-private partnership to support Smart City: the case of "Chaire REVES" |
| Year | 2015 |
| Published | Journal Of Strategy And Management, 8.0, 3 |
| Abstract | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss how French universities can play a key role in generating Smart City (SC) through an innovative Public-Private Partnership (PPP) dedicated to urban transformation. Design/methodology/approach - The authors led an action-research study for five years with several research and pedagogic projects, including users or citizens. Findings - The paper points out main factors of SC development. It also presents shared demonstrators' characteristics, including industrial scale, sustainability, and citizens' participation. Research limitations/implications - This research is experimented with only one regional multi-case study. Practical implications - Practical implications of this paper include a University of Lorraine diversification strategy through the "Chaire REVES" supported by public and private partners. Social implications - At the regional level, industrial-university-territorial partnerships could tackle both societal and economical issues "with," "for," and "by" citizens. Originality/value - Based on the Living Lab concept, this case study shows a concrete regional university strategy involving: user-centric design, collaborative processes, citizens' workshops, and new financial and organizational answers enabling collaboration between private companies and public institutions. The paper also argues that innovative PPPs involving users are necessary for developing SC. |
| https://hal.science/hal-01332233/file/Dupont%202015%20Draft%20-%20Innovative%20PPP%20-%20Chaire%20REVES.pdf |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
39488
|
Vrabie, C Smart Leadership - Examples Of Best Practices In Governing Smart Cities(2020) | |
| 45819
|
Capdevila, I; Zarlenga, MI Smart city or smart citizens? The Barcelona case(2015)Journal Of Strategy And Management, 8, 3 | |
| 40339
|
Pultrone, G Participation and Governance for More Human Smart Cities(2014)Tema-Journal Of Land Use Mobility And Environment, 7, 2 | |
| 37992
|
Engelbert, J; van Zoonen, L; Hirzalla, F Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness(2019) | |
| 35991
|
Lange, K; Knieling, J EU Smart City Lighthouse Projects between Top-Down Strategies and Local Legitimation: The Case of Hamburg(2020)Urban Planning, 5, 1 | |
| 43907
|
Bifulco, F; Tregua, M; Amitrano, CC Co-Governing Smart Cities Through Living Labs. Top Evidences From Eu(2017) | |
| 36771
|
Jeannot, G Smart city projects in the continuity of the urban socio-technical regime: The French case(2019)Information Polity, 24, 3 | |
| 37778
|
Liu, TT; Mostafa, S; Mohamed, S; Nguyen, TS Emerging themes of public-private partnership application in developing smart city projects: a conceptual framework(2021)Built Environment Project And Asset Management, 11.0, 1 | |
| 41496
|
Borkowska, K; Osborne, M Locating the fourth helix: Rethinking the role of civil society in developing smart learning cities(2018)International Review Of Education, 64, 3 |