| Title | What can Smart City policies in emerging economies actually achieve? Conceptual considerations and empirical insights from India |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 37650 |
| Authors | Fromhold-Eisebith, M; Eisebith, G |
| Title | What can Smart City policies in emerging economies actually achieve? Conceptual considerations and empirical insights from India |
| Year | 2019 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Smart City (SC) strategies that aim at fostering sustainable urban development through the systemic implementation of modern information and communication technologies (ICTs) continue to appeal to national and municipal governments despite of increasingly skeptical academic debates. Especially in Asian emerging economies aspirations to create SCs are widespread, yet seem hopelessly illusionary in many cases and might actually harm rather than benefit most citizens. This paper acknowledges these critical views, yet also accentuates constructive perspectives on SC achievements that offer rays of hope especially for cities in less developed countries. We propose to emphasize influential process qualities of SC strategies, which can instigate broader governance and institutional transformations locally, rather than mainly looking at the technical product features of final SC settings. Refined conceptual distinctions between the product and process view on achievable outcomes of SC schemes are suggested which also borrow from evolutionary geography perspectives. To illustrate our propositions, the example of India's Smart Cities Mission launched in 2015 is used. While the planned refurbishment of urban spaces in India is rightfully criticized by some, our own qualitative empirical research - a multiple case study analysis of five SC schemes in South India in spring 2018 - reveals several promising process qualities besides implementation deficiencies. Our study finds eight mechanisms of detrimental path dependency that obstruct SC progress, but also eight mechanisms of positive evolutionary change with respect to urban governance procedures. Making agents in emerging economies aware of these potential outcomes that reach beyond a mere urban technology focus can inspire more effective forthcoming SC strategies and policies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
38680
|
Praharaj, S; Han, JH; Hawken, S Towards The Right Model Of Smart City Governance In India(2018) | |
| 39450
|
Gupta, K; Hall, RP Understanding the What, Why, and How of Becoming a Smart City: Experiences from Kakinada and Kanpur(2020)Smart Cities, 3, 2 | |
| 42064
|
Das, DK Exploring the Politico-Cultural Dimensions for Development of Smart Cities in India(2017)International Review For Spatial Planning And Sustainable Development, 5, 3 | |
| 42868
|
Prasad, D; Alizadeh, T What Makes Indian Cities Smart? A Policy Analysis of Smart Cities Mission(2020) | |
| 32925
|
Mittal, S; Sethi, M Smart and Livable Cities: Opportunities to Enhance Quality of Life and Realize Multiple Co-benefits(2018) | |
| 38368
|
Kavta, K; Yadav, PK Indian Smart Cities and Their Financing: A First Look(2017) | |
| 44763
|
Prakash, A Smart Cities Mission in India: some definitions and considerations(2019)Smart And Sustainable Built Environment, 8, 4 | |
| 43809
|
Praharaj, S Area-Based Urban Renewal Approach for Smart Cities Development in India: Challenges of Inclusion and Sustainability(2021)Urban Planning, 6, 4 | |
| 38178
|
Kumar, A; Sarkar, PK Making Delhi a Smart City: Economic Buoyancy with Spatial Justice(2017) | |
| 44367
|
Chatterjee, S; Kar, AK Smart Cities in Developing Economies: A Literature Review and Policy Insights(2015) |