| Title | How to Evaluate Smart Cities' Construction? A Comparison of Chinese Smart City Evaluation Methods Based on PSF |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 37796 |
| Authors | Shi, HB; Tsai, SB; Lin, XW; Zhang, TY |
| Title | How to Evaluate Smart Cities' Construction? A Comparison of Chinese Smart City Evaluation Methods Based on PSF |
| Year | 2018 |
| Published | Sustainability, 10.0, 1 |
| Abstract | With the rapid development of smart cities in the world, research relating to smart city evaluation has become a new research hotspot in academia. However, there are general problems of cognitive deprivation, lack of planning experience, and low level of coordination in smart cities construction. It is necessary for us to develop a set of scientific, reasonable, and effective evaluation index systems and evaluation models to analyze the development degree of urban wisdom. Based on the theory of the urban system, we established a comprehensive evaluation index system for urban intelligent development based on the people-oriented, city-system, and resources-flow (PSF) evaluation model. According to the characteristics of the comprehensive evaluation index system of urban intelligent development, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) combined with the experts' opinions determine the index weight of this system. We adopted the neural network model to construct the corresponding comprehensive evaluation model to characterize the non-linear characteristics of the comprehensive evaluation indexes system, thus to quantitatively quantify the comprehensive evaluation indexes of urban intelligent development. Finally, we used the AHP, AHP-BP (Back Propagation), and AHP-ELM (Extreme Learning Machine) models to evaluate the intelligent development level of 151 cities in China, and compared them from the perspective of model accuracy and time cost. The final simulation results show that the AHP-ELM model is the best evaluation model. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/37/pdf?version=1514186861 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
45744
|
Zhang, YJ; Liu, FY; Gu, ZQ; Chen, ZX; Shi, Y; Li, AH Research on Smart City Evaluation Based on Hierarchy of Needs(2019) | |
| 37896
|
Xu, JY; Song, R; Zhu, H Evaluation of Smart City Sustainable Development Prospects Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method(2022) | |
| 42587
|
Zheng, Y; Chen, MC Construction of Intelligent City Evaluation System Based on Entropy Model(2017) | |
| 45496
|
Hsu, WL; Wu, X; Yu, FC; Sun, KS Research on Shanghai Smart City Evaluation System in the Era of 5G Internet of Things(2021) | |
| 36117
|
Qu, Y Evaluation of Smart City Development Potential in Major Cities of China Based on the KPCA Method(2016) | |
| 45234
|
He, F Research on Evaluation System of Smart City Construction Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process(2017) | |
| 41343
|
Li, X; Fong, PSW; Dai, SL; Li, YC Towards sustainable smart cities: An empirical comparative assessment and development pattern optimization in China(2019) | |
| 35917
|
Hsu, WL; Qiao, M; Xu, HY; Zhang, CM; Liu, HL; Shiau, YC Smart City Governance Evaluation in the Era of Internet of Things: An Empirical Analysis of Jiangsu, China(2021)Sustainability, 13, 24 | |
| 45730
|
Li, YJ; Qian, YF; Li, Q; Li, LN Evaluation of Smart City Construction and Optimization of City Brand Model under Neural Networks(2023)Computer Science And Information Systems, 20, 2 | |
| 36540
|
Yong, X; Yan, C; Weiyao; Qiang, X A study on the construction of evaluative system of Smart City based on entropy-weighted matter-element model method(2019)Concurrency And Computation-Practice & Experience, 31, 9 |