| Title | Controversing the datafied smart city: Conceptualising a 'making-controversial' approach to civic engagement |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 38151 |
| Authors | Baibarac-Duignan, C; de Lange, M |
| Title | Controversing the datafied smart city: Conceptualising a 'making-controversial' approach to civic engagement |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | Big Data & Society, 8, 2 |
| Abstract | In this paper, we propose the concept of controversing as an approach for engaging citizens in debates around the datafied city and in shaping responsible smart cities that incorporate diverse public values. Controversing addresses the engagement of citizens in discussions about the datafication of urban life by productively deploying controversies around data. Attempts to engage citizens in the smart city frequently involve 'neutral' data visualisations aimed at making abstract sociotechnical issues more tangible. In addition, citizens are meant to gather around issues already defined externally by others. Instead, we focus on how people might become engaged and develop the capacity to shape alternative urban futures. We suggest that making controversial apparently less contentious issues in the smart city allows people to identify their own issues, come together temporarily as a public, imagine alternative possibilities and thus develop capacities for action. In this context, controversies can act as agents of change and open up new spaces for participation and action. We develop the notion of controversing as a deliberate strategy of making datafication controversial, and operationalise the term along the dimensions of recontextualisation, meaning-making and agency. We then look at two cases from the mid-sized city of Amersfoort in the Netherlands, first to test the conceptual potential of controversing to expose how frictions shape citizen engagement, and second to analyse how controversing may frame design-oriented methods aimed at involving diverse participants in discussing datafication and defining public values in the datafied smart city. |
| https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20539517211025557 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
37867
|
Rijshouwer, EA; Leclercq, EM; van Zoonen, L Public views of the smart city: Towards the construction of a social problem(2022)Big Data & Society, 9, 1 | |
| 40890
|
de Lange, M The Right to the Datafied City: Interfacing the Urban Data Commons(2019) | |
| 39618
|
Bunders, DJ; Varró, K Problematizing data-driven urban practices: Insights from five Dutch 'smart cities'(2019) | |
| 41045
|
Schliwa, G Smart Cities by Design? Interrogating Design Thinking for Citizen Participation(2019) | |
| 37611
|
Perng, SY; Maalsen, S Civic Infrastructure and the Appropriation of the Corporate Smart City(2020)Annals Of The American Association Of Geographers, 110.0, 2 | |
| 40081
|
Breuer, J; Pierson, J The right to the city and data protection for developing citizen-centric digital cities(2021)Information Communication & Society, 24, 6 | |
| 44300
|
Joss, S Future cities: asserting public governance(2018) | |
| 40482
|
Gstrein, OJ Data autonomy: beyond personal data abuse, sphere transgression, and datafied gentrification in smart cities(2024)Ethics And Information Technology, 26, 3 | |
| 43134
|
Farías, I; Widmer, S Ordinary Smart Cities How Calculated Users, Professional Citizens, Technology Companies and City Administrations Engage in a More-than-digital Politics(2017)Tecnoscienza-Italian Journal Of Science & Technology Studies, 8, 2 | |
| 43839
|
Yeo, SJI Negotiating digital urban futures: The limits and possibilities of future-making in Singapore(2024)Transactions Of The Institute Of British Geographers, 49, 2 |