| Title | Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: A research challenge with policy implications |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 39949 |
| Authors | Borsekova, K; Koróny, S; Vanová, A; Vitálisová, K |
| Title | Functionality between the size and indicators of smart cities: A research challenge with policy implications |
| Year | 2018 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The paper focusses on the concept of a smart city and its specific components in relation to size of the city. Smart cities are a topic whose key importance is being increasingly recognised across both academic disciplines and urban planning. The idea of a smart city is a dream of urban planners all over the world, and a subject of many research and business initiatives as well as policy debates. As cities vary considerably in size, it is important to ask if the size influences the level of selected indicators of smart cities. Our main presumption is that the development level of indicators of smart cities varies in cities of different size. Our scientific objective is to find a simple understandable model linking the categorical variable "city size" to a group of smart city indicators. Our data set contains 26 smart city indicators for 158 European smart cities, divided into two sizes: medium-sized cities and larger cities. We draw from the methodology of "European Smart Cities" elaborated by the Vienna University of Technology (Project ID: 314704) that classify European smart cities and smart city indicators by considering their size. Analysing the statistics by using decision tree modelling, we identify the most significant indicators of smart cities that can divide smart cities into size categories with impressive 96.2% correct classification. Besides excellent classification result based on real empirical data, several research results overturn common assumptions about smart cities. Based on the research results the paper also highlights intriguing future challenges in smart city research and policy development. Several research results have policy implications and might be useful for urban planners, policy representatives and decision makers. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
38857
|
Caragliu, A; Del Bo, CF Do Smart Cities Invest in Smarter Policies? Learning From the Past, Planning for the Future(2016)Social Science Computer Review, 34, 6 | |
| 38656
|
Albino, V; Berardi, U; Dangelico, RM Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, and performance(2013) | |
| 45762
|
Correia, D; Marques, JL; Teixeira, L Assessing and Ranking EU Cities Based on the Development Phase of the Smart City Concept(2023)Sustainability, 15, 18 | |
| 39776
|
Correia, D; Marques, JL; Teixeira, L The State-of-the-Art of Smart Cities in the European Union(2022)Smart Cities, 5, 4 | |
| 38843
|
Albino, V; Berardi, U; Dangelico, RM Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives(2015)Journal Of Urban Technology, 22, 1 | |
| 45422
|
Perboli, G; Rosano, M A Taxonomic Analysis of Smart City Projects in North America and Europe(2020)Sustainability, 12, 18 | |
| 36503
|
Priano, FH; Guerra, CF Fully Smart Cities Analysis of the City to Smart City transformation process(2016) | |
| 39227
|
Alexopoulos, C; Pereira, GV; Charalabidis, Y; Madrid, L A Taxonomy of Smart Cities Initiatives(2019) | |
| 39549
|
Dameri, RP; Benevolo, C; Veglianti, E; Li, YY Understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: A comparison between Italy and China(2019) | |
| 44842
|
Dameri, RP; Rosenthal-Sabroux, C Smart City and Value Creation(2014) |