| Title | We have always done it wrong: the city as complex network, superorganism and more-than-human sentient being. An experiment in interdisciplinary [re]thinking |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 40412 |
| Authors | Buiani, R |
| Title | We have always done it wrong: the city as complex network, superorganism and more-than-human sentient being. An experiment in interdisciplinary [re]thinking |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Journal Of Science And Technology Of The Arts, 12, 1 |
| Abstract | This paper draws on an experiment in interdisciplinary pedagogy, which took place in the Winter 2019, during a course on "Digital Technology and Society" at the University of Toronto. During the course, the city was chosen as the main source of inquiry. At the core of this experiment was a concern that current models of the city as "Smart City" have become disproportionately skewed towards the implementation of digital technologies, creating monocultural conceptions that prioritize predominantly anthropocentric top-down visions, and neglect the rich more-than-human layers of networks and naturecultural relationships shaping the city today. This concern has been addressed by a number of scholars such as Shannon Mattern (2016, 2017), James Bridle (2018) and Erik Swyngedouw (2006), while alternative views by new materialists such as Jane Bennet (2009), and human geographers Sarah Whatmore (2005) and Ruth Panelli (2010) among others have better addressed the complexities and the multispecies intersections, unfolding within urban conglomerates, and making up the urban technocultural fabric. Students were asked to reflect on the following questions: What is a Smart City? How is the city made smart [1]? Who/what makes it so? Is the city a complex system? Preliminary responses to the above questions reflected an exclusive vision oriented towards technological innovation. Introducing a fluid approach based on evidence from direct observation and in vivo exploration, hands on experiments with non-human others, and crossdisciplinary readings, challenged this perspective and nourished a different view of the city as a much richer, complicated and unpredictable entity where biology and information exist in symbiosis. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
38967
|
Odendaal, N; Aurigi, A Digital Cities 10: Towards a localised socio-technical understanding of the 'real smart city(2017) | |
| 36195
|
Brown, W Mapping the Realities of Smart Urbanism: A Method to Promote Transdisciplinary Smart City Approaches(2022) | |
| 37990
|
Odendaal, N Everyday urbanisms and the importance of place: Exploring the elements of the emancipatory smart city(2021)Urban Studies, 58, 3 | |
| 40967
|
Yigitcanlar, T; Foth, M; Kamruzzaman, M Towards Post-Anthropocentric Cities: Reconceptualizing Smart Cities to Evade Urban Ecocide(2019)Journal Of Urban Technology, 26, 2 | |
| 37528
|
Tompson, T Understanding the Contextual Development of Smart City Initiatives: A Pragmatist Methodology(2017)She Ji-The Journal Of Design Economics And Innovation, 3.0, 3 | |
| 39559
|
Tironi, M; Criado, TS Of Sensors and Sensitivities Towards a Cosmopolitics of "Smart Cities"?(2015)Tecnoscienza-Italian Journal Of Science & Technology Studies, 6, 1 | |
| 43103
|
Baji, P Smart cities and their domains - Future challenges for urban researchers?(2017)Ter Es Tarsadalom, 31, 1 | |
| 35865
|
Rodó, MT Experimenting With The Urban: Politics, Discourses And Practices Of The Smart City And Datification(2019)Athenea Digital, 19, 2 | |
| 37729
|
Burns, R; Welker, P Interstitiality in the smart city: More than top-down and bottom-up smartness(2023)Urban Studies, 60.0, 2 | |
| 45634
|
Sadowski, J; Bendor, R Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary(2019)Science Technology & Human Values, 44, 3 |