Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Prioritising low-risk and high-potential circular economy strategies for decarbonisation: A meta-analysis on consumer-oriented product-service systems
ID_Doc 4047
Authors Koide, R; Murakami, S; Nansai, K
Title Prioritising low-risk and high-potential circular economy strategies for decarbonisation: A meta-analysis on consumer-oriented product-service systems
Year 2022
Published
Abstract The circular economy has potential synergies with climate change mitigation, although quantitative evidence for these synergies in the consumer product sector has not yet been systematically evaluated. We conducted a systematic review of existing studies of consumer-oriented product-service systems (PSS) on the lifecycle impacts, focusing on a meta-analysis of global warming potentials. Potential reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and the risk of backfire as a result of 10 types of circular economy strategies were investigated by reviewing 103 studies and more than 1500 scenarios for consumer durable and semi-durable products. As many as threequarters of the reviewed studies analyse only one circular economy strategy rather than comparing (e.g., reusing, sharing, and renting) or integrating multiple strategies (e.g., leasing combined with remanufacturing). Approximately one-third of the reviewed studies rely on assumptions for set parameters of use, transport, and end-of-life phases, whereas more than half of the studies do not consider service and infrastructure provisions, or imperfect product substitution. Among the reviewed case studies, upgrading, repair, refurbishing, and pooling showed moderate to high improvement potentials with lower risks of backfiring, whereas servitisation, sharing, and reuse were associated with higher backfire risks, but they had high improvement potentials. The risk of backfiring was explained by factors such as transport, number of uses, product substitution and lifetime, maintenance, energy source, and energy efficiency. This meta-analysis revealed the importance of prioritising low-risk strategies, controlling for rebound effects of high-potential strategies, and integrating multiple strategies in order to utilize PSS for climate change mitigation.
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111858

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
16501 van Loon, P; Diener, D; Harris, S Circular products and business models and environmental impact reductions: Current knowledge and knowledge gaps(2021)
1555 Polverini, D; Miretti, U An approach for the techno-economic assessment of circular economy requirements under the Ecodesign Directive(2019)
913 Cooper, SJG; Giesekam, J; Hammond, GP; Norman, JB; Owen, A; Rogers, JG; Scott, K Thermodynamic insights and assessment of the 'circular economy'(2017)
477 Fortes, P; Lopes, R; Dias, L; Seixas, J; Gouveia, JP; Martinho, S; Monjardino, J; Tente, H Circular Economy And Climate Mitigation: Benefits And Conflicts(2019)
17012 Levänen, J; Uusitalo, V; Härri, A; Kareinen, E; Linnanen, L Innovative recycling or extended use? Comparing the global warming potential of different ownership and end-of-life scenarios for textiles(2021)Environmental Research Letters, 16, 5
28443 Koide, R; Yamamoto, H; Nansai, K; Murakami, S Agent-based model for assessment of multiple circular economy strategies: Quantifying product-service diffusion, circularity, and sustainability(2023)
28587 Nag, U; Sharma, SK; Kumar, V Multiple Life-Cycle Products: A Review of Antecedents, Outcomes, Challenges, and Benefits in a Circular Economy(2022)Journal Of Engineering Design, 33.0, 3
2016 Kaddoura, M; Kambanou, ML; Tillman, AM; Sakao, T Is Prolonging the Lifetime of Passive Durable Products a Low-Hanging Fruit of a Circular Economy? A Multiple Case Study(2019)Sustainability, 11, 18
890 Polverini, D Regulating the circular economy within the ecodesign directive: Progress so far, methodological challenges and outlook(2021)
16836 Singh, J; Cooper, T; Cole, C; Gnanapragasam, A; Shapley, M Evaluating approaches to resource management in consumer product sectors - An overview of global practices(2019)
Scroll