| Title | D2C-DM: Distributed-to-Centralized Data Management for Smart Cities Based on Two Ongoing Case Studies |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 40707 |
| Authors | Sinaeepourfard, A; Krogstie, J; Petersen, SA |
| Title | D2C-DM: Distributed-to-Centralized Data Management for Smart Cities Based on Two Ongoing Case Studies |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Smart city environments follow different technological management strategies (such as resource management, data management, and so on) between end-users to city planners and technological devices (e.g., sensor, camera surveillance, etc.) to enhance citizens' quality of life through the variety of the smart services. Data management is one of the most critical issues in smart cities because data is a core resource in the smart city. Without proper data, no smart services in the smart cities exist to make a connection between end-users and technological devices. A few numbers of distributed-to-centralize data management architectures have been proposed. In addition, there are several different distributed schema by several technological options exist (e.g., cloudlet, fog, etc.) but almost all of the studies used a distributed-to-centralized data management architecture based on fog to cloud technologies. Therefore, the fogto-cloud data management architecture can use both potentials of fog and cloud technologies, including the decrease in communication latencies, organizing distinct policies (e.g., data filtering, data compression, etc.) and so on. In this paper, first, previous studies of distributed-to-centralized data management architectures through two different smart city scenarios have been revisited. Afterward, the easy use and adaptation of the distributed-to-centralized data management architecture to any smart city scenario has been shown. In addition, the advantages of this data management architecture have been highlighted including efficiency rates for the data collection and data storage, and reducing data and network traffic. Finally, a number of the lesson learned from previous case studies has been addressed. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
37194
|
Sinaeepourfard, A; Krogstie, J; Petersen, SA; Ahlers, D F2c2C-DM: A Fog-to-cloudlet-to-Cloud Data Management Architecture in Smart City(2019) | |
| 42393
|
Sinaeepourfard, A; Petersen, SA; Ahlers, D D2C-SM: Designing a Distributed-to-Centralized Software Management Architecture for Smart Cities(2019) | |
| 41276
|
Sinaeepourfard, A; Garcia, J; Masip-Bruin, X; Marin-Tordera, E Data Preservation through Fog-to-Cloud (F2C) Data Management in Smart Cities(2018) | |
| 37467
|
Sinaeepourfard, A; Krogstie, J; Petersen, SA; Gustaysen, A A Zero Emission Neighbourhoods Data Management Architecture for Smart City Scenarios: Discussions toward 6Vs challenges(2018) | |
| 42703
|
Sinaeepourfard, A; Krogstie, J; Petersen, SA A Distributed-to-Centralized Smart Technology Management (D2C-STM) model for Smart Cities: a Use Case in the Zero Emission Neighborhoods(2019) | |
| 41858
|
Robberechts, J; Sinaeepourfard, A; Goethals, T; Volckaert, B A Novel Edge-to-Cloud-as-a-Service (E2CaaS) Model for Building Software Services in Smart Cities(2020) | |
| 40160
|
Sinaeepourfard, A; Garcia, J; Masip-Bruin, X; Marin-Tordera, E; Yin, XF; Wang, C A Data LifeCycle Model for Smart Cities(2016) | |
| 41043
|
Sinaeepourfard, A; Krogstie, J; Soltvedt, TK; Skuggevik, T Large-Scale Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Management in Smart Cities based on Edge to Cloud Orchestration(2020) | |
| 42797
|
Streimikis, J; Kislitsyn, E; Surnina, N; Gorodnichev, V An integrated platform for managing information in smart cities(2021) | |
| 36277
|
Mohamed, N; Al-Jaroodi, J; Jawhar, I; Lazarova-Molnar, S; Mahmoud, S SmartCityWare: A Service-Oriented Middleware for Cloud and Fog Enabled Smart City Services(2017) |