| Title | Smart Urban Mobility System Evaluation Model Adaptation to Vilnius, Montreal and Weimar Cities |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 41452 |
| Authors | Zapolskyte, S; Trépanier, M; Burinskiene, M; Survile, O |
| Title | Smart Urban Mobility System Evaluation Model Adaptation to Vilnius, Montreal and Weimar Cities |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Sustainability, 14, 2 |
| Abstract | To date, there is no developed and validated way to assess urban smartness. When evaluating smart city mobility systems, different authors distinguish different indicators. After analysing the evaluation indicators of the transport system presented in the scientific articles, the most relevant and influential indicators were selected. This article develops a hierarchical evaluation model for evaluating a smart city transportation system. The indicators are divided into five groups called "factors". Several indicators are assigned to each of the listed groups. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was used to calculate the significance of the selected indicators and to compare urban mobility systems. The applied multi-criteria evaluation methods were simple additive weighting (SAW), complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), and technique for order preference by similiarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The significance of factors and indicators was determined by expert evaluation methods: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), direct, when experts evaluate the criteria as a percentage (sum of evaluations of all criteria 100%) and ranking (prioritisation). The evaluation and comparison of mobility systems were performed in two stages: when the multi-criteria evaluation is performed according to the indicators of each factor separately and when performing a comprehensive assessment of the smart mobility system according to the integrated significance of the indicators. A leading city is identified and ranked according to the smartness level. The aim of this article is to create a hierarchical evaluation model of the smart mobility systems, to compare the smartness level of Vilnius, Montreal, and Weimar mobility systems, and to create a ranking. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/715/pdf?version=1641809785 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
37929
|
Zapolskyte, S; Burinskiene, M; Trépanier, M Evaluation Criteria Of Smart City Mobility System Using Mcdm Method(2020)Baltic Journal Of Road And Bridge Engineering, 15, 4 | |
| 42404
|
Feizi, A; Joo, S; Kwigizile, V; Oh, JS A pervasive framework toward sustainability and smart-growth: Assessing multifaceted transportation performance measures for smart cities(2020) | |
| 40087
|
Hajduk, S Multi-Criteria Analysis of Smart Cities on the Example of the Polish Cities(2021)Resources-Basel, 10, 5 | |
| 37010
|
Hanine, M; Boutkhoum, O; El Barakaz, F; Lachgar, M; Assad, N; Rustam, F; Ashraf, I An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Approach for Smart City Development Evaluation for Developing Countries: Moroccan Context(2021)Mathematics, 9.0, 21 | |
| 35999
|
Sotirelis, P; Nakopoulos, P; Valvi, T; Grigoroudis, E; Carayannis, E Measuring Smart City Performance: a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Approach(2022)Journal Of The Knowledge Economy, 13, 4 | |
| 77319
|
Kundu, P; Görçün, OF; Garg, CP; Küçükönder, H; Çanakçioglu, M Evaluation of public transportation systems for sustainable cities using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making model(2023) | |
| 39316
|
Ogrodnik, K Multi-Criteria Analysis Of Smart Cities In Poland(2020)Geographia Polonica, 93, 2 | |
| 45744
|
Zhang, YJ; Liu, FY; Gu, ZQ; Chen, ZX; Shi, Y; Li, AH Research on Smart City Evaluation Based on Hierarchy of Needs(2019) | |
| 35857
|
Braga, IFB; Ferreira, FAF; Ferreira, JJM; Correia, RJC; Pereira, LF; Falcao, PF A DEMATEL analysis of smart city determinants(2021) | |
| 3307
|
Pamucar, D; Durán-Romero, G; Yazdani, M; López, AM A decision analysis model for smart mobility system development under circular economy approach(2023) |