| Title | Closing the loopholes in circular economy definitions and assessments using ontological criteria, with a demonstration for Australia |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 4209 |
| Authors | van Bueren, BJA; Iyer-Raniga, U; Argus, K; Leenders, MAAM |
| Title | Closing the loopholes in circular economy definitions and assessments using ontological criteria, with a demonstration for Australia |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The burgeon concept of Circular Economy (CE) has fundamental issues hindering clarity and comprehensive assessments. This paper uses established ontological criteria to review and improve the CE definition and (assessment) frameworks. The review reveals that mainstream CE definitions and assessments are fuzzy, shift problems, oversimplified and not synchronized. This causes many loopholes that not lead towards sustainability. Therefore, an improved definition and framework is proposed, specifically for CE of XL to XS regions (scales from planetary to neighborhoods). A CE should strive towards self-sufficiency on each scale to avoid problems shifting to other regions or future society. The framework elaborates on a comprehensive systems-approach, which connects the triple bottom line across nine ecosystem processes, eight societal processes, and six economic production processes. The proposed definition and framework are demonstrated in an assessment of regional pressures and their impacts of Australia with 2020 data. The framework aims to better inform decision-makers on trade-offs between vital processes to minimize unintended problem shifting. The definition and framework have improved universal application for meaningful comparisons and optimization towards a sustainable CE in any region. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
153
|
Korhonen, J; Nuur, C; Feldmann, A; Birkie, SE Circular economy as an essentially contested concept(2018) | |
| 952
|
Upadhayay, S; Alqassimi, O; Khashadourian, E; Sherm, A; Prajapati, D Development in the Circular Economy Concept: Systematic Review in Context of an Umbrella Framework(2024)Sustainability, 16, 4 | |
| 109
|
Ho, OTK; Gajanayake, A; Iyer-Raniga, U Transitioning to a state-wide circular economy: Major stakeholder interviews(2023) | |
| 3429
|
Van Bueren, BJA; Iyer-Raniga, U; Leenders, MAAM; Argus, K Comprehensiveness of circular economy assessments of regions: a systematic review at the macro-level(2021)Environmental Research Letters, 16, 10 | |
| 2144
|
Desing, H; Brunner, D; Takacs, F; Nahrath, S; Frankenberger, K; Hischier, R A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource based, systemic approach(2020) | |
| 2974
|
Borrello, M; Pascucci, S; Cembalo, L Three Propositions to Unify Circular Economy Research: A Review(2020)Sustainability, 12, 10 | |
| 28722
|
Köseoglu, MN From the ideal to the reality: How to operationalise an impactful Circular Economy transition(2022) | |
| 1981
|
Nobre, GC; Tavares, E The quest for a circular economy final definition: A scientific perspective(2021) | |
| 624
|
Feldman, J; Seligmann, H; King, S; Flynn, M; Shelley, T; Helwig, A; Burey, P Circular economy barriers in Australia: How to translate theory into practice?(2024) | |
| 1233
|
Tóth, G Circular Economy and its Comparison with 14 Other Business Sustainability Movements(2019)Resources-Basel, 8, 4 |