Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Digital Rights to the City: Local Practices and Negotiations of Urban Space on Decidim
ID_Doc 42489
Authors Suter, A; Kaiser, L; Dusek, M; Hasler, F; Tappert, S
Title Digital Rights to the City: Local Practices and Negotiations of Urban Space on Decidim
Year 2024
Published
Abstract The organization, management, and production of urban space through digital information and communication technologies have become a central means for governing urban life. To overcome a lack of citizen-centered practices in today's smart cities, governments and municipalities institutionalize citizen-centered digital infrastructures such as Decidim, a digital infrastructure proposing non-corporate, decentralized, and collaborative forms of digital production to evoke participatory governance practices and ultimately social transformation (Barandiaran et al., 2018). Swiss city administrations have adapted the Decidim platform for participatory budgeting processes and city-wide participation platforms since 2019. This article explores the process of institutional adoption, focusing on how the use of Decidim impacts local practices and negotiations for governing urban space. The examination of the Decidim platform in the Swiss cities of Zurich and Lucerne will be framed by re-conceptualizing Lefebvre's right to the city in the age of digital transformation. The findings show that for a successful introduction of the Decidim platform based on principles of the right to the city (a) local needs for a new digital democratic instrument need to be pre-existent, (b) government employees must implement a scope of action which allows organized civil society and grassroots initiatives to appropriate the infrastructure for their own purposes, and (c) local practices of hybrid communication and organizing must be aligned with the structure of the platform. Nevertheless, digital participation tools such as Decidim cannot solve entrenched inequalities such as the financialization of land, the issue of disadvantaged neighborhoods, or the absence of voting rights for certain communities. Therefore, city administrations need to integrate hybrid participation strategies which prioritise collective power over distributive power as well as tackle urban inequalities through political means.
PDF https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/download/7065/3496

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
39222 Ribera-Fumaz, R Moving from Smart Citizens to Technological Sovereignty?(2019)
38369 Smith, A; Martín, PP Going Beyond the Smart City? Implementing Technopolitical Platforms for Urban Democracy in Madrid and Barcelona(2021)Journal Of Urban Technology, 28, 1-2
42595 Lynch, CR Contesting Digital Futures: Urban Politics, Alternative Economies, and the Movement for Technological Sovereignty in Barcelona(2020)Antipode, 52, 3
41288 Ylipulli, J; Luusua, A Without libraries what have we? Public libraries as nodes for technological empowerment in the era of smart cities, AI and big data(2019)
41841 Lekkas, CK; Souitaris, V Bureaucracy Meets Digital Reality: The Unfolding of Urban Platforms in European Municipal Governments(2023)Organization Studies, 44, 10
44137 Hatuka, T; Zur, H From smart cities to smart social urbanism: A framework for shaping the socio-technological ecosystems in cities(2020)
43134 Farías, I; Widmer, S Ordinary Smart Cities How Calculated Users, Professional Citizens, Technology Companies and City Administrations Engage in a More-than-digital Politics(2017)Tecnoscienza-Italian Journal Of Science & Technology Studies, 8, 2
79190 Bolívar, MPR Creative citizenship: the new wave for collaborative environments in smart cities(2018)Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion, 31, 1
36020 Esposito, G; Terlizzi, A; Guarino, M; Crutzen, N Interpreting digital governance at the municipal level: Evidence from smart city projects in Belgium(2024)International Review Of Administrative Sciences, 90, 2
40890 de Lange, M The Right to the Datafied City: Interfacing the Urban Data Commons(2019)
Scroll