| Title | A Procedure to Support Systematic Selection of Leading Indicators for Sustainability Performance Measurement of Circular Economy Initiatives |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 4254 |
| Authors | Kravchenko, M; Pigosso, DCA; McAloone, TC |
| Title | A Procedure to Support Systematic Selection of Leading Indicators for Sustainability Performance Measurement of Circular Economy Initiatives |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Sustainability, 12, 3 |
| Abstract | Circular economy (CE) is considered a vital model to tackle resource scarcity and reduce waste by promoting strategies that redefine production and consumption systems. Industrial actors integrate CE principles in their strategic and operational practices to overcome these challenges, simultaneously aiming at enhancing their sustainability performance. Despite numerous frameworks to guide organizations in innovating towards CE, very few have embedded explicit sustainability considerations to assist practitioners in understanding the potential sustainability performance of the CE initiatives early in the development process. To assist a structured process of measuring sustainability performance, the main goal of this paper is to propose a procedure for a systematic selection of suitable leading performance indicators to support an informed sustainability-oriented decision-making process. To fulfill this aim, a hypothetical-deductive approach has been followed to, firstly, develop the selection procedure, and secondly, evaluate and improve it using a case study approach. The findings reveal that the procedure enables a systematic selection of relevant indicators by taking into account the manifold combinations of CE strategies and business processes, characteristics of the company and its sustainability objective. Different from many other approaches, the novelty lies in relying on a dynamic, as opposed to 'prescriptive', indicator selection process to induce learning about sustainability considerations significant for a particular CE initiative and corporate context. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/951/pdf?version=1581334434 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
1164
|
Kravchenko, M; Pigosso, DC; McAloone, TC Towards the ex-ante sustainability screening of circular economy initiatives in manufacturing companies: Consolidation of leading sustainability-related performance indicators(2019) | |
| 433
|
Kravchenko, M; McAloone, TC; Pigosso, DCA Implications of developing a tool for sustainability screening of circular economy initiatives(2019) | |
| 1138
|
Saidani, M; Yannou, B; Leroy, Y; Cluzel, F; Kendall, A A taxonomy of circular economy indicators(2019) | |
| 3077
|
Aljamal, D; Salem, A; Khanna, N; Hegab, H Towards sustainable manufacturing: A comprehensive analysis of circular economy key performance indicators in the manufacturing industry(2024) | |
| 1108
|
Rossi, E; Bertassini, AC; Ferreira, CD; do Amaral, WAN; Ometto, AR Circular economy indicators for organizations considering sustainability and business models: Plastic, textile and electro-electronic cases(2020) | |
| 318
|
Voukkali, I; Papamichael, I; Loizia, P; Lekkas, DF; Rodríguez-Espinosa, T; Navarro-Pedreño, J; Zorpas, AA Waste metrics in the framework of circular economy(2023)Waste Management & Research, 41, 12 | |
| 2011
|
Ngan, SL; How, BS; Teng, SY; Promentilla, MAB; Yatim, P; Er, AC; Lam, HL Prioritization of sustainability indicators for promoting the circular economy: The case of developing countries(2019) | |
| 1167
|
de Oliveira, CT; Oliveira, GGA What Circular economy indicators really measure? An overview of circular economy principles and sustainable development goals(2023) | |
| 2915
|
Martín-Gómez, AM; Pineda-Ganfornina, M; Avila-Gutiérrez, MJ; Agote-Garrido, A; Lama-Ruiz, JR Balanced Scorecard for Circular Economy: A Methodology for Sustainable Organizational Transformation(2024)Sustainability, 16, 4 | |
| 28713
|
Gomes, PR; Carstens, L; Vilas-Boas, MC; Kauling, MF; Cruz, ST; Dziedzic, M Assessing circular economy in Brazilian industries through the analytical hierarchy process(2022)Revista Brasileira De Ciencias Ambientais, 57.0, 2 |