| Title | Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 43400 |
| Authors | Viitanen, J; Kingston, R |
| Title | Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector |
| Year | 2014 |
| Published | Environment And Planning A-Economy And Space, 46, 4 |
| Abstract | Climate change and advances in urban technology propel forward the 'smart city'. As decision makers strive to find a technological fix, smart city strategies are often based on technological orthodoxies which are conceptually and empirically shallow. The motivation behind this paper is to address the conceptual adolescence which relates to the wholesale digitisation of the city by pursuing a twin argument about the democratic and environmental consequences. The authors draw on interdisciplinary theory and insights from urban studies, infrastructure, informatics, and the sociology of the Internet to critique the way the 'smart city' is taken forward. It is concluded that private firms market smart city services and solutions based on an ideological legacy of 'ubiquitous computing', 'universal infrastructure', and 'green technology'. Based on evidence from three UK cities-Manchester, Birmingham, and Glasgow-it is argued that the underlying principle of future city strategies is to expand the market for new technology products and services to support 'green growth' with disregard for their wider impacts. For citizens, becoming a consumer of the technologies is often presented as progressive 'participation' or 'empowerment' with unknown or hidden consequences both political and environmental. The city systems become a digital marketplace where citizen-consumers' participation is increasingly involuntary and the hegemony of global technology firms is inflated. What follows is that the city's 'intelligent systems' are defined through a digital consumer experience that has inherent biases and leaves parts of the city and its population unaccounted for. This renders the city less resilient in the face of future social and climatic risks. |
| http://polired.upm.es/index.php/ciur/article/download/3498/3572 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
42927
|
Martin, CJ; Evans, J; Karvonen, A Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America(2018) | |
| 45325
|
Park, J; Yoo, S Evolution of the smart city: three extensions to governance, sustainability, and decent urbanisation from an ICT-based urban solution(2023) | |
| 43103
|
Baji, P Smart cities and their domains - Future challenges for urban researchers?(2017)Ter Es Tarsadalom, 31, 1 | |
| 37174
|
March, H The Smart City and other ICT-led techno-imaginaries: Any room for dialogue with Degrowth?(2018) | |
| 37426
|
Webster, CWR; Leleux, C Searching for the real sustainable smart city?(2019)Information Polity, 24.0, 3 | |
| 31271
|
Cavada, M; Hunt, DVL; Rogers, CDF Do smart cities realise their potential for lower carbon dioxide emissions?(2016)Proceedings Of The Institution Of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability, 169, 6 | |
| 43041
|
Sengupta, U; Sengupta, U SDG-11 and smart cities: Contradictions and overlaps between social and environmental justice research agendas(2022) | |
| 44983
|
Treude, M Sustainable Smart City-Opening a Black Box(2021)Sustainability, 13, 2 | |
| 44137
|
Hatuka, T; Zur, H From smart cities to smart social urbanism: A framework for shaping the socio-technological ecosystems in cities(2020) | |
| 35916
|
Adám, S A critical geographical analysis of the smart city concept - theoretical background and possible research directions(2020)Ter Es Tarsadalom, 34, 2 |