| Title | When Alphabet Inc. Plans Toronto's Waterfront: New Post-Political Modes of Urban Governance |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 44162 |
| Authors | Carr, C; Hesse, M |
| Title | When Alphabet Inc. Plans Toronto's Waterfront: New Post-Political Modes of Urban Governance |
| Year | 2020 |
| Published | Urban Planning, 5, 1 |
| Abstract | 'Smart cities' has become a hegemonic concept in urban discourses, despite substantial criticism presented by scholarly research and activism. The aim of this research was to understand what happens when one of the big digital corporations enters the field of real estate and land use development and urban planning, how existing institutions respond to this, and how modes of urban governance are affected. Alphabet Inc.'s plans for Toronto's waterfront provided insights into these questions. Our investigations traced a complex web of place-making practices that involved all levels of government, the general public, and networks of actors throughout the private sector. Methodologically, the discourse was reconstructed with local fieldwork, interviews with key actors, participating in tours and public meetings, and secondary sources. It was found that Alphabet Inc.'s plan to build a world-class digital city contained some lessons for urban studies and urban planning practice. First, Alphabet Inc.'s plans, which unfolded amidst initiatives to expand the knowledge economy, confirmed concerns that the trajectory of neoliberal, market-driven land use and speculation along the waterfront remains unchanged. Second, digital infrastructures are potentially a Trojan Horse. Third, it was seen that municipalities and their modes of urban planning are vulnerable to the political economic manoeuvrings of large corporate power. Fourth, Alphabet Inc. operates as a post-political package driven by a new coalition of politics, where the smart city is sold as a neutral technology. The controversies surrounding the project, however, stirred a civic discourse that might signal a return of the political. |
| https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/download/2519/2519 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
40689
|
Morgan, K; Webb, B Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto's 'Smart' Waterfront(2020)Urban Planning, 5, 1 | |
| 38038
|
Tierney, TF Toronto's Smart City: Everyday Life or Google Life?(2019)Architecture_Mps, 15, 1 | |
| 69775
|
Goodman, EP; Powles, J Urbanism Under Google: Lessons From Sidewalk Toronto(2019)Fordham Law Review, 88.0, 2 | |
| 36458
|
Filion, P; Moos, M; Sands, G Urban neoliberalism, smart city, and Big Tech: The aborted Sidewalk Labs Toronto experiment(2023)Journal Of Urban Affairs, 45, 9 | |
| 37611
|
Perng, SY; Maalsen, S Civic Infrastructure and the Appropriation of the Corporate Smart City(2020)Annals Of The American Association Of Geographers, 110.0, 2 | |
| 43134
|
Farías, I; Widmer, S Ordinary Smart Cities How Calculated Users, Professional Citizens, Technology Companies and City Administrations Engage in a More-than-digital Politics(2017)Tecnoscienza-Italian Journal Of Science & Technology Studies, 8, 2 | |
| 44651
|
Mann, M; Mitchell, P; Foth, M; Anastasiu, I #BlockSidewalkto Barcelona: Technological sovereignty and the social license to operate smart cities(2020)Journal Of The Association For Information Science And Technology, 71, 9 | |
| 37729
|
Burns, R; Welker, P Interstitiality in the smart city: More than top-down and bottom-up smartness(2023)Urban Studies, 60.0, 2 | |
| 37626
|
Karvonen, A; Cook, M; Haarstad, H Urban Planning and the Smart City: Projects, Practices and Politics(2020)Urban Planning, 5.0, 1 | |
| 36579
|
Sepehr, P; Felt, U Urban Imaginaries as Tacit Governing Devices: The Case of Smart City Vienna(2023) |