| Title | A framework for reconciling user requirements and actual provision for Smart City implementation |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 45272 |
| Authors | Adnan, YM; Hamzah, H; Daud, MN; Dali, MM; Alias, A |
| Title | A framework for reconciling user requirements and actual provision for Smart City implementation |
| Year | 2016 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | The Smart City concept has been recognised as the way forward for cities that have strong ICT facilities and support. This concept provides the basis for a comprehensive city development strategy that could promote efficiency in city management and administration among city dwellers. Any city development concept must be formulated with the user and city characteristics in mind. The requirements of the city users are important in shaping the Smart City policies and programmes for the city. During the implementation of the Smart City initiatives, there is a need to ensure that the level of Smart City implementation matches user expectations. When the actual provision of Smart City features falls below user expectations, it can be said that there are gaps in the provision of Smart City initiatives for the city. The identification of these gaps would assist city managers in diverting more resources into the areas that need attention. This study proposes a framework for a gap analysis that indicates the achievement of required vs. actual Smart City initiative provision. Using Putrajaya, Malaysia as a case study, the intensity of initiative provision is calculated and then 'adjusted' against the intensity of user expectations to yield what is termed as Adjusted Level of Provision (ALP). Since the study has uncovered provision that needs improvement in turning Putrajaya as smart city, this framework could offer a useful tool for Smart City managers in measuring the city's performance. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
45720
|
Jothimani, P; Chenniappan, P; Chidambaranathan, V Factors impinge on the development of a smart city: a field study(2022)Environmental Science And Pollution Research, 29, 57 | |
| 39255
|
Aljowder, T; Ali, M; Kurnia, S Development of a Maturity Model for Assessing Smart Cities: A Focus Area Maturity Model(2023)Smart Cities, 6, 4 | |
| 45267
|
Mustafa, Z; Rusli, MN; Ismail, WR; Suradi, NRM; Zamzuri, ZH; Wahab, AA; Abidin, NZ; Elias, N Comparative Study of the Smart City Models in Selected Cities in Malaysia(2024)Journal Of Quality Measurement And Analysis, 20, 2 | |
| 45189
|
Herdiyanti, A; Hapsari, PS; Susanto, TD Modelling the Smart Governance Performance to Support Smart City Program in Indonesia(2019) | |
| 45062
|
Anindra, F; Supangkat, SH; Kosala, RR Smart Governance as Smart City Critical Success Factor (Case in 15 Cities in Indonesia)(2018) | |
| 39391
|
Agbali, M; Trillo, C; Fernando, T; Oyedele, L; Ibrahim, IA; Olatunji, VO Towards a Refined Conceptual Framework Model for a Smart and Sustainable City Assessment(2019) | |
| 45523
|
Ngo, HV; Le, Q Smart City: An Approach from the View of Smart Urban Governance(2021)International Journal Of Sustainable Construction Engineering And Technology, 12, 1 | |
| 45213
|
Firmanyah, HS; Supangkat, SH; Arman, AA; Adhitya, R Searching Smart City in Indonesia Through Maturity Model Analysis (Case Study in 10 Cities)(2017) | |
| 44962
|
Ependi, U; Rochim, AF; Wibowo, A Smart City Assessment for Sustainable City Development on Smart Governance: A Systematic Literature Review(2022) | |
| 42770
|
Habeeb, R Analysis of Major Parameters of Smart Cities and Their Suitability in Indian Context(2017) |