| Title | Analyzing Temporal Variability in Inventory Data for Life Cycle Assessment: Implications in the Context of Circular Economy |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 4703 |
| Authors | Shoaib-ul-Hasan, S; Roci, M; Asif, FMA; Salehi, N; Rashid, A |
| Title | Analyzing Temporal Variability in Inventory Data for Life Cycle Assessment: Implications in the Context of Circular Economy |
| Year | 2021 |
| Published | Sustainability, 13, 1 |
| Abstract | Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used frequently as a decision support tool for evaluating different design choices for products based on their environmental impacts. A life cycle usually comprises several phases of varying timespans. The amount of emissions generated from different life cycle phases of a product could be significantly different from one another. In conventional LCA, the emissions generated from the life cycle phases of a product are aggregated at the inventory analysis stage, which is then used as an input for life cycle impact assessment. However, when the emissions are aggregated, the temporal variability of inventory data is ignored, which may result in inaccurate environmental impact assessment. Besides, the conventional LCA does not consider the environmental impact of circular products with multiple use cycles. It poses difficulties in identifying the hotspots of emission-intensive activities with the potential to mislead conclusions and implications for both practice and policy. To address this issue and to analyze the embedded temporal variations in inventory data in a CE context, the paper proposes calculating the emission intensity for each life cycle phase. It is argued that calculating and comparing emission intensity, based on the timespan and amount of emissions for individual life cycle phases, at the inventory analysis stage of LCA offers a complementary approach to the traditional aggregate emission-based LCA approach. In a circular scenario, it helps to identify significant issues during different life cycle phases and the relevant environmental performance improvement opportunities through product, business model, and supply chain design. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
6006
|
André, H Opening the black box of the use phase in circular economy life cycle assessments: Environmental performance of shell jacket reuse(2024)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 28, 3 | |
| 3716
|
André, H; Björklund, A A framework to open the black box of the use phase in circular economy life cycle assessments: The case of shell jacket reuse(2023)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 27, 4 | |
| 13181
|
Daigo, I Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Materials(2022)Tetsu To Hagane-Journal Of The Iron And Steel Institute Of Japan, 108, 11 | |
| 24387
|
Bassi, SA; Tonini, D; Ekvall, T; Astrup, TF A life cycle assessment framework for large-scale changes in material circularity(2021) | |
| 12151
|
Rossi, L; Leone, D; Barni, A; Fontana, A Assessing the Sustainability of Industrial Equipment Life Extension Strategies through a Life Cycle Approach: Methodology and Practical Guidelines(2022)Processes, 10.0, 2 | |
| 28801
|
Jerome, A; Helander, H; Ljunggren, M; Janssen, M Mapping and testing circular economy product-level indicators: A critical review(2022) | |
| 6163
|
Samani, P Synergies and gaps between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)(2023) | |
| 2028
|
Walker, S; Coleman, N; Hodgson, P; Collins, N; Brimacombe, L Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy(2018)Sustainability, 10, 3 | |
| 2860
|
Chen, ZY; Huang, LZ Application review of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) in circular economy: From the perspective of PSS (Product Service System)(2019) | |
| 4505
|
Lindgreen, ER; Mondello, G; Salomone, R; Lanuzza, F; Saija, G Exploring the effectiveness of grey literature indicators and life cycle assessment in assessing circular economy at the micro level: a comparative analysis(2021)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 26, 11 |