| Title | A Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment of Battery Electric Vehicles, Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles, and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles through a Comparative Circular Economy Assessment Approach |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 4946 |
| Authors | Ahmed, AA; Nazzal, MA; Darras, BM; Deiab, IM |
| Title | A Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment of Battery Electric Vehicles, Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles, and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles through a Comparative Circular Economy Assessment Approach |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Sustainability, 15, 1 |
| Abstract | Transitioning to zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) is thought to substantially curb emissions, promoting sustainable development. However, the extent of the problem extends beyond tailpipe emissions. To facilitate decision-making and planning of future infrastructural developments, the economic, social, and technological factors of ZEVs should also be addressed. Therefore, this work implements the circular economy paradigm to identify the most suitable vehicle type that can accelerate sustainable development by calculating circularity scores for Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEVs) and two ZEVs, the Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs). The circularity assessment presents a novel assessment procedure that interrelates the environmental, economic, social, and technological implications of each vehicle type on the three implementation levels of the circular economy (i.e., The macro, meso, and micro levels). The results of our analysis suggest that not all ZEVs are considered sustainable alternatives to ICEVs. BEVs scored the highest relative circularity score of 36.8% followed by ICEVs and FCEVs scoring 32.9% and 30.3% respectively. The results obtained in this study signify the importance of conducting circular economy performance assessments as planning tools as this assessment methodology interrelate environmental, social, economic, and technological factors which are integral for future infrastructural and urban planning. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
101
|
Esteva, LCA; Kasliwal, A; Kinzler, MS; Kim, HC; Keoleian, GA Circular economy framework for automobiles: Closing energy and material loops(2021)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 25, 4 | |
| 1551
|
Kifor, CV; Grigore, NA Circular Economy Approaches for Electrical and Conventional Vehicles(2023)Sustainability, 15, 7 | |
| 2070
|
Patel, A; Singh, S Implementing circular economy strategies in the automobile industry - a step toward creating sustainable automobiles(2023)Benchmarking-An International Journal, 30, 7 | |
| 22148
|
Picatoste, A; Justel, D; Mendoza, JMF Circularity and life cycle environmental impact assessment of batteries for electric vehicles: Industrial challenges, best practices and research guidelines(2022) | |
| 4895
|
Ahmed, AA; Nazzal, MA; Darras, BM; Deiab, IM Global warming potential, water footprint, and energy demand of shared autonomous electric vehicles incorporating circular economy practices(2023) | |
| 64647
|
Oliveri, LM; D'Urso, D; Trapani, N; Chiacchio, F Electrifying Green Logistics: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Electric and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles(2023)Energies, 16, 23 | |
| 27551
|
Bonsu, NO Towards a circular and low-carbon economy: Insights from the transitioning to electric vehicles and net zero economy(2020) | |
| 28539
|
Richter, JL A circular economy approach is needed for electric vehicles comment(2022)Nature Electronics, 5.0, 1 | |
| 4390
|
Silvestri, L; Forcina, A; Silvestri, C; Arcese, G; Falcone, D Exploring the Environmental Benefits of an Open-Loop Circular Economy Strategy for Automotive Batteries in Industrial Applications(2024)Energies, 17, 7 | |
| 15465
|
Onat, NC; Kucukvar, M A systematic review on sustainability assessment of electric vehicles: Knowledge gaps and future perspectives(2022) |