| Title | Circular economy disclaimers: Rethinking property relations at the end of cheap nature |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 5042 |
| Authors | Isenhour, C; Berry, B; Victor, E |
| Title | Circular economy disclaimers: Rethinking property relations at the end of cheap nature |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Converging environmental crises have inspired a movement to shift dominant economic forms away from linear "take-make-waste" models and toward more circular forms that reimagine discarded materials as valuable resources. With the coming "end of cheap nature", this invitation to reimagine waste as something more than "the political other of capitalist value" is seen as both an environmental necessity and an opportunity for green growth. Less often discussed is that the circular economy, in its reconfiguration of value, also has the potential to reshape contemporary property relations and dismantle existing forms of circularity. In this paper, we explore potential shifts in property relations through an analysis of three strategies often imagined as key to facilitating the transition to circularity-extended producer responsibility, repair, and online resale. Each case synthesizes existing research, public discourse, and findings from a series of focus groups and interviews with circular economy professionals. While this research is preliminary and demands additional research, all three cases suggest caution given the possibility that some circular economy strategies can concentrate value and control of existing materials stocks, dispossess those most vulnerable, and alienate participants in existing reuse, recycling, and repair markets. Drawing on and adapting Luxemburg's concept of primitive accumulation, Tsing's ideas about salvage accumulation, Moore's work on commodity frontiers and recent research which encourages more attention to processes of commoning-we argue that without careful attention to relations of power and justice in conceptualizations of ownership and the collective actions necessary to transform our economic forms in common, transitions toward the circular economy have the potential to enclose the value of discards and exacerbate inequality. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
863
|
Reike, D; Vermeulen, WJV; Witjes, S The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? - Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options(2018) | |
| 204
|
Thomas, S Waste, marginal property practices and the circular economy(2020)Journal Of Property Planning And Environmental Law, 12, 3 | |
| 4892
|
Hill, JE The circular economy: from waste to resource stewardship, part I(2015)Proceedings Of The Institution Of Civil Engineers-Waste And Resource Management, 168, 1 | |
| 2248
|
James, P Re-embedding the circular economy in Circles of Social Life: beyond the self-repairing (and still-rapacious) economy(2022)Local Environment, 27, 10-11 | |
| 28889
|
Hobson, K 'Small stories of closing loops': social circularity and the everyday circular economy(2020)Climatic Change, 163.0, 1 | |
| 4083
|
Moreau, V; Sahakian, M; van Griethuysen, P; Vuille, F Coming Full Circle Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy(2017)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 21, 3 | |
| 28678
|
Eickhoff, H The appeal of the circular economy revisited: on track for transformative change or enabler of moral licensing?(2024)Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11.0, 1 | |
| 400
|
Rinkinen, J; Shove, E Material culture and the circular economy(2023) | |
| 2310
|
Shanahan, M Can Economics Assist the Transition to a Circular Economy?(2018) | |
| 3844
|
Zotti, J; Bigano, A Write circular economy, read economy's circularity. How to avoid going in circles(2019)Economia Politica, 36, 2 |