| Title | Application of circular economy principles to pastoral farming: development of an assessment framework |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 5234 |
| Authors | Burggraaf, VT; Mazzetto, AM; Romera, AJ; Mercer, GJK; Ledgard, SF |
| Title | Application of circular economy principles to pastoral farming: development of an assessment framework |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Animal Production Science, 62, 8 |
| Abstract | Context. Circular economy principles are being adopted to design out waste, use resources more efficiently and maintain ecosystem health. Aims. This study developed a framework to assess the 'circularity' of pastoral farms, using a New Zealand dairy farm as a case study. Methods. Key resource inputs and environmental impacts to assess for the farming system were determined. Nitrogen and phosphorus flows were assessed using the OVERSEER (R) model, to then determine their circularity on the basis of the material circularity indicator. Life-cycle assessment was used to determine the carbon footprint and fossil fuel depletion associated with the farm. Singleuse plastic disposal was calculated on the basis of farm purchases and end-points of packaging. Key results. MCI circularity scores were 0.46 for nitrogen, 0.48 for phosphorus and total circularity 0.46, which could be improved by focusing on reducing the high rates of mineral fertiliser use and large losses of nitrogen to water and the atmosphere. Although the farm's cradle-to-farm-gate fossil fuel resource depletion footprint (1.16 MJ/kg fat- and proteincorrected milk) was low compared with other New Zealand and European dairy farms, its carbon footprint of 0.85 kg carbon dioxide-equivalent/kg fat and protein corrected milk was high for New Zealand, with enteric methane emissions and inputs of supplementary feeds being the major sources. Plastic waste was a minor source of waste compared with nutrients, but the key sources were identified. Conclusions and implications. This framework could be used and adapted to assess the circularity of nutrients in pastoral farming systems and help identify key areas to reduce the depletion of critical resources and negative environmental impacts. Further development and testing are required for a range of farming systems. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
25341
|
Moller, H; Lyng, KA; Röös, E; Samsonstuen, S; Olsen, HF Circularity indicators and added value to traditional LCA impact categories: example of pig production(2024)International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment, 29, 8 | |
| 162
|
Herbstritt, SM; Fathel, SL; Reinford, B; Richard, TL Circular Economy In Pennsylvania(2023)Journal Of The Asabe, 66, 3 | |
| 12396
|
Teleshkan, E; Van Schoubroeck, S; Spiller, M; Van Passel, S Assessing policy impacts on nutrient circularity: a comprehensive review(2024) | |
| 23511
|
Papangelou, A; Mathijs, E Assessing agro-food system circularity using nutrient flows and budgets(2021) | |
| 5415
|
Katiyar, A; Gedam, VV The circular economy and fertilizer industry: a systematic review of principal measuring tool(2024) | |
| 16853
|
Rocchi, L; Paolotti, L; Cortina, C; Fagioli, FF; Boggia, A Measuring circularity: an application of modified Material Circularity Indicator to agricultural systems(2021)Agricultural And Food Economics, 9, 1 | |
| 5515
|
Zhang, JN; Wang, MM; Yin, CB; Dogot, T The potential of dairy manure and sewage management pathways towards a circular economy: A meta-analysis from the life cycle perspective(2021) | |
| 22556
|
H-Hargitai, R; Somogyi, V Impact of water as raw material on material circularity - A case study from the Hungarian food sector(2023)Heliyon, 9.0, 7 | |
| 516
|
Secco, C; da Luz, LM; Pinheiro, E; de Francisco, AC; Puglieri, FN; Piekarski, CM; Freire, FMCS Circular economy in the pig farming chain: Proposing a model for measurement(2020) | |
| 943
|
Brändström, J; Saidani, M Comparison between circularity metrics and LCA: A case study on circular economy strategies(2022) |