| Title | The Circular Economy Concept in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry: Challenges and Enablers of Current Practices among Brands and Retailers |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 5968 |
| Authors | Fuchs, M; Hovemann, G |
| Title | The Circular Economy Concept in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry: Challenges and Enablers of Current Practices among Brands and Retailers |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | Sustainability, 14, 13 |
| Abstract | Based on an analysis of challenges and enablers of circular economy (CE) practices for outdoor brands and retailers, we aim to identify which of these CE practices are best suited for the outdoor sporting goods industry. To develop the study, we used a qualitative methodology through a content analysis of 21 expert interviews. From these interviews, we derived challenges and enablers for different CE elements in the categories reduce, circulate products, circulate materials, and shift towards renewable resources. Our findings indicate trade-offs related to the high complexity and functionality of many products, the juxtaposition of extremely technical and less technical products, and the low product return rate as challenges, while design for durability, design for repairability, and linking the degree of circularity to product types were identified as enablers. Based on our data, we argue that among circular practices reduce should form a basis upon which other aspects can build, with durability and repairability best suited for technical outdoor gear. As our study adds an industry-specific perspective, it contributes new knowledge to the CE literature. It also helps managers with the practical implications, as we argue they should be aware of potential downsides of CE elements and thus consider carefully which of those elements can help support their overall business and sustainability strategies. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
20528
|
Fuchs, M; Hovemann, G Consumer preferences for circular outdoor sporting goods: An Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint analysis among residents of European outdoor markets(2022) | |
| 5428
|
Fuchs, M; Hovemann, G Homogeneity or Heterogeneity: An Institutional Theory View on Circular Economy Practices in the Outdoor Sporting Goods Industry(2022)Sustainability, 14, 10 | |
| 20641
|
Guerreschi, A; Wielopolski, M Importance Of Knowing What Your Customers Know To Effective Circular Design(2022)Environmental Engineering And Management Journal, 21, 10 | |
| 16501
|
van Loon, P; Diener, D; Harris, S Circular products and business models and environmental impact reductions: Current knowledge and knowledge gaps(2021) | |
| 3745
|
Franconi, A; Ceschin, F; Peck, D Structuring Circular Objectives and Design Strategies for the Circular Economy: A Multi-Hierarchical Theoretical Framework(2022)Sustainability, 14, 15 | |
| 17078
|
Shahbazi, S; Jönbrink, AK Design Guidelines to Develop Circular Products: Action Research on Nordic Industry(2020)Sustainability, 12, 9 | |
| 6006
|
André, H Opening the black box of the use phase in circular economy life cycle assessments: Environmental performance of shell jacket reuse(2024)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 28, 3 | |
| 3888
|
den Hollander, MC; Bakker, CA; Hultink, EJ Product Design in a Circular Economy Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms(2017)Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 21, 3 | |
| 28901
|
Moreno, M; De los Rios, C; Rowe, Z; Charnley, F A Conceptual Framework for Circular Design(2016)Sustainability, 8.0, 9 | |
| 1466
|
Bucur, LM Exploring the Role of Consumers in Promoting a Circular Economy: Increasing Awareness and Engagement(2023)Proceedings Of The International Conference On Business Excellence, 17, 1 |