| Title | Methods to Account for Design for Disassembly: Status of the Building Sector |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 6055 |
| Authors | Lausselet, C; Dahlstrom, OA; Thyholt, M; Eghbali, A; Schneider-Marin, P |
| Title | Methods to Account for Design for Disassembly: Status of the Building Sector |
| Year | 2023 |
| Published | Buildings, 13, 4 |
| Abstract | Embracing the design for disassembly (DfD) mindset when constructing new and renovating existing buildings is a promising means of achieving our climate targets and putting the circular economy principles in practice, as promoted in the European Green Deal. Current greenhouse gas emissions' accounting frameworks only deal with DfD to a certain extent. A better and more common understanding of how this can be carried out will not only help promote DfD but also shed light on how DfD should be seen in the context of other emission reduction measures. This could help to achieve balanced and credible scenarios that can be used in policy-making processes. When building components or materials are used over several cycles (buildings), the allocation of environmental impacts across the different buildings must be discussed. In an attempt to address this issue, this study examined whether and how current LCA standards for construction products and buildings consider such allocation issues. |
| https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/4/1012/pdf?version=1681285289 |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
28478
|
Pristerà, G; Tonini, D; Tornaghi, ML; Caro, D; Sala, S Taxonomy of design for deconstruction options to enable circular economy in buildings(2024) | |
| 16571
|
De Wolf, C; Hoxha, E; Fivet, C Comparison of environmental assessment methods when reusing building components: A case study(2020) | |
| 13755
|
Melella, R; Di Ruocco, G; Sorvillo, A Circular Construction Process: Method for Developing a Selective, Low CO2eq Disassembly and Demolition Plan(2021)Sustainability, 13, 16 | |
| 10358
|
Cruz-Rios, F; Grau, D Design for Disassembly: An Analysis of the Practice (or Lack Thereof) in the United States(2020) | |
| 4247
|
Eberhardt, LCM; Ronholt, J; Birkved, M; Birgisdottir, H Circular Economy potential within the building stock - Mapping the embodied greenhouse gas emissions of four Danish examples(2021) | |
| 2676
|
Joensuu, T; Leino, R; Heinonen, J; Saari, A Developing Buildings' Life Cycle Assessment in Circular Economy-Comparing methods for assessing carbon footprint of reusable components(2022) | |
| 22428
|
Eberhardt, LCM; Birgisdóttir, H; Birkved, M Life cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly(2019)Building Research And Information, 47.0, 6 | |
| 5305
|
Minunno, R; O'Grady, T; Morrison, GM; Gruner, RL Exploring environmental benefits of reuse and recycle practices: A circular economy case study of a modular building(2020) | |
| 23027
|
Munaro, MR; Tavares, SF Design for adaptability and disassembly: guidelines for building deconstruction(2023) | |
| 6096
|
Almusaed, A; Yitmen, I; Myhren, JA; Almssad, A Assessing the Impact of Recycled Building Materials on Environmental Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: A Comprehensive Framework for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions(2024)Buildings, 14, 6 |