| Title | The effect of plastic packaging recycling policy interventions as a complement to extended producer responsibility schemes: A partial equilibrium model |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 6150 |
| Authors | Larrain, M; Billen, P; Van Passel, S |
| Title | The effect of plastic packaging recycling policy interventions as a complement to extended producer responsibility schemes: A partial equilibrium model |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | Extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes have effectively increased the plastic waste that is separately collected. However, due to the structure of the recycling industry, EPR cannot increase recycling rates up to the target levels.Additional policy instruments to increase recycling rates such as recycled content targets, green dot fees bonus for recycled content, recycling targets and taxes on non-recycled plastic packaging have been discussed on a political level in the last years. However, very little research has quantitatively studied the effectiveness of these policy interventions.Using a partial equilibrium model, this paper examines the effectiveness of the implementation of the aforementioned policy instruments to increase recycling rates and the impact on different stakeholders of the value chain: plastic producers, consumers, producer responsibility organization and recyclers.Results show that direct interventions (recycled content standards and recycling targets) have the benefit of decoupling the recycling industry from external markets such as the oil market. They can be a good starting point to increase recycling, but in the long term they may be restricting by not presenting incentives to achieve recycling levels beyond the targeted amounts and by limiting technological innovation. On the contrary, eco-nomic interventions such as a green dot fee bonus or a packaging tax create economic incentives for recycling. However, these incentives are diminished by the lower perceived quality of packaging with higher recycled content levels. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
536
|
Foschi, E; Bonoli, A The Commitment of Packaging Industry in the Framework of the European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy(2019)Administrative Sciences, 9, 1 | |
| 8034
|
Kumamaru, H; Takeuchi, K The recycled content of plastic products: estimating the impact of a recycling law on the input mix(2023)Environmental Economics And Policy Studies, 25, 3 | |
| 22993
|
Larrain, M; Van Passel, S; Thomassen, G; Van Gorp, B; Nhu, TT; Huysveld, S; Van Geem, KM; De Meester, S; Billen, P Techno-economic assessment of mechanical recycling of challenging post-consumer plastic packaging waste(2021) | |
| 27158
|
Rubio, S; Ramos, TRP; Leitao, MMR; Barbosa-Povoa, AP Effectiveness of extended producer responsibility policies implementation: The case of Portuguese and Spanish packaging waste systems(2019) | |
| 24386
|
Joltreau, E Extended Producer Responsibility, Packaging Waste Reduction and Eco-design(2022)Environmental & Resource Economics, 83, 3 | |
| 22516
|
Larrain, M; Billen, P; Cifuentes, L; Van Passel, S Economic and environmental implications of policy instruments for the circular economy: A case study for postconsumer polyethylene film recycling in Europe(2024) | |
| 64724
|
Cristóbal, J; Albizzati, PF; Giavini, M; Caro, D; Manfredi, S; Tonini, D Management practices for compostable plastic packaging waste: Impacts, challenges and recommendations(2023) | |
| 7288
|
Mager, M; Traxler, I; Fischer, J; Finger, DC Potential Analysis of the Plastics Value Chain for Enhanced Recycling Rates: A Case Study in Iceland(2022)Recycling, 7, 5 | |
| 26085
|
Picuno, C; Van Eygen, E; Brouwer, MT; Kuchta, K; van Velzen, EUT Factors Shaping the Recycling Systems for Plastic Packaging Waste-A Comparison between Austria, Germany and The Netherlands(2021)Sustainability, 13, 12 | |
| 29250
|
Schulte, A; Kampmann, B; Galafton, C Measuring the Circularity and Impact Reduction Potential of Post-Industrial and Post-Consumer Recycled Plastics(2023)Sustainability, 15.0, 16 |