Knowledge Agora



Similar Articles

Title Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions
ID_Doc 6291
Authors Bishop, G; Styles, D; Lens, PNL
Title Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions
Year 2021
Published
Abstract There is currently a shift from petrochemical to bio-based plastics (bioplastics). The application of comprehensive and appropriately designed LCA studies are imperative to provide clear evidence on the comparative sustainability of bioplastics. This review explores the growing collective of LCA studies that compare the environmental footprints of specific bioplastics against those of petrochemical plastics. 44 relevant studies published between 2011 and 2020 were reviewed to explore important methodological choices regarding impact category selection, inventory completeness (e.g. inclusion of additives), boundary definition (e.g. inclusion of land-use change impacts), representation of biogenic carbon, choice of end-of-life scenarios, type of LCA, and the application of uncertainty analysis. Good practice examples facilitated identification of common gaps and weaknesses in LCA studies applied to benchmark bioplastics against petrochemical plastics. Many studies did not provide a holistic picture of the environmental impacts of bioplastic products, thereby potentially supporting misleading conclusions. For comprehensive evaluation of bioplastic sustainability, we recommend that LCA practitioners: embrace more detailed and transparent reporting of LCI data within plastic LCA studies; adopt a comprehensive impact assessment methodology pertaining to all priority environmental challenges; incorporate multiple plastic use cycles within functional unit definition and system boundaries where plastics can be recycled; include additives in life cycle inventories unless there is clear evidence that they contribute <1% to all impact categories; apply biogenic carbon storage credits only to long-term carbon sinks; account for (indirect) land-use change arising from feedstock cultivation; prospectively consider realistic scenarios of deployment and end-of-life, preferably within a consequential LCA framework.
PDF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105451

Similar Articles

ID Score Article
26555 Islam, M; Xayachak, T; Haque, N; Lau, D; Bhuiyan, M; Pramanik, BK Impact of bioplastics on environment from its production to end-of-life(2024)
24703 Mastrolia, C; Giaquinto, D; Gatz, C; Pervez, MN; Hasan, SW; Zarra, T; Li, CW; Belgiorno, V; Naddeo, V Plastic Pollution: Are Bioplastics the Right Solution?(2022)Water, 14, 22
6166 Miller, SA The capabilities and deficiencies of life cycle assessment to address the plastic problem(2022)
16825 Di Bartolo, A; Infurna, G; Dintcheva, NT A Review of Bioplastics and Their Adoption in the Circular Economy(2021)Polymers, 13, 8
24369 Cucina, M The lesser of two evils: Enhancing biodegradable bioplastics use to fight plastic pollution requires policy makers interventions in Europe(2023)
25483 Ali, SS; Abdelkarim, EA; Elsamahy, T; Al-Tohamy, R; Li, FH; Kornaros, M; Zuorro, A; Zhu, DC; Sun, JZ Bioplastic production in terms of life cycle assessment: A state-of-the- art review(2023)
3156 Rosenboom, JG; Langer, R; Traverso, G Bioplastics for a circular economy(2022)Nature Reviews Materials, 7, 2
23478 Lackner, M; Mukherjee, A; Koller, M What Are "Bioplastics"? Defining Renewability, Biosynthesis, Biodegradability, and Biocompatibility(2023)Polymers, 15, 24
27446 Aubin, S; Beaugrand, J; Berteloot, M; Boutrou, R; Buche, P; Gontard, N; Guillard, V Plastics in a circular economy: Mitigating the ambiguity of widely-used terms from stakeholders consultation(2022)
25790 Atabay, D; Rosentrater, KA; Ghnimi, S The sustainability debate on plastics: Cradle to grave Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economical Analysis of PP and PLA polymers with a "Polluter Pays Principle" perspective(2022)
Scroll