| Title |
Herbicide Use in the Era of Farm to Fork: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Future Implications |
| ID_Doc |
63199 |
| Authors |
Triantafyllidis, V; Mavroeidis, A; Kosma, C; Karabagias, IK; Zotos, A; Kehayias, G; Beslemes, D; Roussis, I; Bilalis, D; Economou, G; Kakabouki, I |
| Title |
Herbicide Use in the Era of Farm to Fork: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Future Implications |
| Year |
2023 |
| Published |
Water Air And Soil Pollution, 234, 2 |
| Abstract |
Climate change mitigation is a major concern of the European Union (EU). In 2019, the EU presented the European Green Deal (EGD), a new environmental strategy that aimed to neutralize climate change by 2050. Within its policy areas, the EGD included the Farm to Fork (F2F) Strategy that aims to reduce pesticide use by 50%, by 2030. This reduction was proposed due to the supposed negative effects of pesticides on the environment and its biota. Among the different pesticide groups (herbicides, fungicides, insecticides, etc.) though, herbicides are perhaps the hardest to reduce. This review aimed to shed light to any factors that might hinder the reduction of herbicide use; thus, the implementation of the Farm to Fork Strategy underlines some of its weaknesses and highlights key points of a viable herbicide reduction-related policy framework. The literature suggests that integrated weed management (IWM) consists perhaps the most suitable approach for the reduction of herbicides in the EU. Even though it is too soon to conclusively assess F2F, its success is not impossible. |
| PDF |
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11270-023-06125-x.pdf
|
