| Title | Incorporation of Rebound Effect into Energy Efficient Measures Cost-Benefit Analysis Model |
|---|---|
| ID_Doc | 63529 |
| Authors | Poon, I |
| Title | Incorporation of Rebound Effect into Energy Efficient Measures Cost-Benefit Analysis Model |
| Year | 2015 |
| Published | |
| Abstract | To reduce carbon emission in domestic buildings, UK Government launched the Green Deal (GD) programme to incentivise the people to install energy efficient building system in their buildings by "ensuring" them the new installation's saving would cover the investment. However, only 1,787 measures were installed in the first year and sonic argue that the programme would cause financial risk to the households as the "golden rule" of the policy not always true even cost-benefit analysis was conducted before the launch of GD and assessments were conducted when joining the programme. It is observed that due to "rebound effect" and other uncertainties in the modelling, the traditional cost-benefit analysis may not be accurate. Therefore, this paper tries to review official the investment performance model provided by taking rebound effect into account. It is found that before rebound effect was applied, 14% of the sample measures were not able to repay the investment, while the rebound effect would further extend the repayment period for the energy saving measures, 13%, 70% and 23.3% for "lighting", "building fabric" and "heating and cooling" cannot be repaid in 20 years after installation. The prospect theory is also applied to explain why the households were reluctant to invest while the possibility of earning money is still high. |
Similar Articles
| ID | Score | Article |
|---|---|---|
62920
|
Booth, AT; Choudhary, R Decision making under uncertainty in the retrofit analysis of the UK housing stock: Implications for the Green Deal(2013) | |
| 10080
|
Nydahl, H; Andersson, S; Åstrand, AP; Olofsson, T Including future climate induced cost when assessing building refurbishment performance(2019) | |
| 62856
|
Dowson, M; Poole, A; Harrison, D; Susman, G Domestic UK retrofit challenge: Barriers, incentives and current performance leading into the Green Deal(2012) | |
| 64293
|
Tovar, MA The structure of energy efficiency investment in the UK households and its average monetary and environmental savings(2012) | |
| 63085
|
Rosenow, J; Eyre, N; Bürger, V; Rohde, C OVERCOMING THE UPFRONT INVESTMENT BARRIER - COMPARING THE GERMAN CO2 BUILDING REHABILITATION PROGRAMME AND THE BRITISH GREEN DEAL(2013)Energy & Environment, 24, 1-2 | |
| 67681
|
Brotman, BA The impact of corporate tax policy on sustainable retrofits(2017)Journal Of Corporate Real Estate, 19, 1 | |
| 62865
|
Howarth, C; Roberts, BM The Role of the UK Green Deal in Shaping Pro-Environmental Behaviours: Insights from Two Case Studies(2018)Sustainability, 10, 6 | |
| 8023
|
Copiello, S; Gabrielli, L; Micelli, E Building Industry and Energy Efficiency: A Review of Three Major Issues at Stake(2021) | |
| 63021
|
Rosenow, J; Eyre, N The Green Deal and the Energy Company Obligation(2013)Proceedings Of The Institution Of Civil Engineers-Energy, 166, 3 | |
| 64085
|
Jones, P; Lannon, S; Patterson, J Retrofitting existing housing: how far, how much?(2013)Building Research And Information, 41, 5 |