Knowledge Agora

Title	Assessing the feasibility of CO₂ removal strategies in achieving climate-neutral power systems: Insights from biomass, CO₂ capture, and direct air capture in Europe
ID_Doc	63608
Authors	Béres, R; Junginger, M; van den Broek, M
Title	Assessing the feasibility of CO₂ removal strategies in achieving climate-neutral power systems: Insights from biomass, CO₂ capture, and direct air capture in Europe
Year	2024
Published
Abstract	To achieve the European Union's goal of climate neutrality by 2050, negative emissions may be required to compensate for emissions exceeding allocated carbon budgets. Therefore, carbon removal technologies such as bioenergy with carbon capture (BECCS) and direct air capture (DAC) may need to play a pivotal role in the power system. To design carbon removal strategies, more insights are needed into the impact of sustainable biomass availability and the feasibility of carbon capture and storage (CCS), including the expensive and energy-intensive DAC on achieving net-zero and net-negative targets. Therefore, in this study the European power system in 2050 is modelled at an hourly resolution in the cost-minimization PLEXOS modelling platform. Three climate-neutral scenarios with targets of 0, -1, and -3.9 Mt CO2/year (which agree with varying levels of climate justice) are assessed for different biomass levels, and CCS availability. Findings under baseline assumptions reveal that in a climate-neutral power system with biomass and CCS options, it is cost-effective to complement variable renewable energy with a mix of combined cycle natural gas turbines (CCNGT) for flexibility and BECCS as base load to compensate for the CO2 emissions from natural gas and additional carbon removal in the net-negative scenarios. The role of these technologies becomes more prominent, with -3.9 GtCO(2)/year target. Limited biomass availability necessitates additional 0.4-4 GtCO(2)/year DAC, 10-50 GW CCNGT with CCS, and 10-50 GW nuclear. Excluding biomass doubles system costs and increases reliance on nuclear energy up to 300 TWh/year. The absence of CCS increases costs by 78%, emphasizing significant investments in bioenergy, nuclear power, hydrogen storage, and biogas. Sensitivity analysis and limitations of the study are fully discussed.
PDF	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2024.100166

Similar Articles

ID	Score	Article
69486		Mullen, D; Lucquiaud, M On the cost of zero carbon electricity: A techno-economic analysis of combined cycle gas turbines with post-combustion CO 2 capture(2024)
7373		Li, X; Damartzis, T; Stadler, Z; Moret, S; Meier, B; Friedl, M; Maréchal, F Decarbonization in Complex Energy Systems: A Study on the Feasibility of Carbon Neutrality for Switzerland in 2050(2020)
63030		Pietzcker, RC; Osorio, S; Rodrigues, R Tightening EU ETS targets in line with the European Green Deal: Impacts on the decarbonization of the EU power sector(2021)
64206		Misconel, S; Prina, MG; Hobbie, H; Möst, D; Sparber, W Model-based step-wise marginal CO₂ abatement cost curves to determine least-cost decarbonization pathways for sector-coupled energy systems(2022)
67848		Torvanger, A Governance of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): accounting, rewarding, and the Paris agreement(2019)Climate Policy, 19, 3
63419		Rodrigues, R; Pietzcker, R; Fragkos, P; Price, J; McDowall, W; Siskos, P; Fotiou, T; Luderer, G; Capros, P Narrative-driven alternative roads to achieve mid-century CO₂ net neutrality in Europe(2022)
6838		Wang, XC; Wang, J; Popescu, AEP; Ong, BHY Sustainable use of energy contributes to carbon neutrality and environmental footprints reduction(2023)
64245		Scarlat, N; Prussi, M; Padella, M Quantification of the carbon intensity of electricity produced and used in Europe(2022)
63445		Tzelepi, V; Zeneli, M; Kourkoumpas, DS; Karampinis, E; Gypakis, A; Nikolopoulos, N; Grammelis, P Biomass Availability in Europe as an Alternative Fuel for Full Conversion of Lignite Power Plants: A Critical Review(2020)Energies, 13, 13